Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31972672›Full record

ArticleAcademic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges2020

Training Mentor-Mentee Pairs to Build a Robust Culture for Mentorship and a Pipeline of Clinical and Translational Researchers: The Colorado Mentoring Training Program.

Kathryn A Nearing, Bridget M Nuechterlein, Shuyuan Tan, Judy T Zerzan, Anne M Libby, Gregory L Austin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kathryn A NearingK.A. Nearing is assistant professor, Division of Geriatrics, Center on Aging, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, and associate director for education and evaluation, VA Eastern Colorado Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center (GRECC), Aurora, Colorado. B.M. Nuechterlein is a senior evaluation specialist, The Evaluation Center, University of Colorado Denver, School of Education and Human Development, Denver, Colorado, and Colorado Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute (CCTSI), Aurora, Colorado. S. Tan is an evaluation specialist, The Evaluation Center, University of Colorado Denver, School of Education and Human Development, Denver, Colorado, and CCTSI, Aurora, Colorado. J.T. Zerzan is chief medical officer, Washington State Health Care Authority, Olympia, Washington. A.M. Libby is professor, director, CCTSI COMentor Program, and vice chair for academic affairs, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, and CCTSI, Aurora, Colorado. G.L. Austin is associate professor, director, CCTSI CO-Mentor Program, and vice chair for regional clinical affairs, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, School of Medicine, Department of Gastroenterology, and CCTSI, Aurora, Colorado.
Bridget M Nuechterlein
Shuyuan Tan
Judy T Zerzan
Anne M Libby
Gregory L Austin

Funding

NIH Prior Approval Process ProfessionalUL1TR002535 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI SOKOL, RONALD J. · 2018 to 2022
$51.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002535
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Colorado Mentoring Training program (CO-Mentor) was developed at the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus in 2010, supported by the Colorado Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute. CO-Mentor represents a different paradigm in mentorship training by focusing equally on the development of mentees, who are valued as essential to institutional capacity for effective mentorship. The training model is unique among Clinical and Translational Science Award sites in that it engages mentors and mentees in an established relationship. Dyads participate in 4 day-long sessions scheduled throughout the academic year. Each session features workshops that combine didactic and experiential components. The latter provide structured opportunities to develop mentorship-related skills, including self-knowledge and goal setting, communication skills (including negotiation), "managing up," and the purposeful development of a mentorship support network. Mentors and mentees in 3 recent cohorts reported significant growth in confidence with respect to all mentorship-related skills assessed using a pre-post evaluation survey (P = .001). Mentors reported the most growth in relation to networking to engage social and professional support to realize goals as well as sharing insights regarding paths to success. Mentees reported the most growth with respect to connecting with potential/future mentors, knowing characteristics to look for in current/future mentors, and managing the work environment (e.g., prioritizing work most fruitful to advancing research/career objectives). CO-Mentor represents a novel approach to enhancing mentorship capacity by investing equally in the development of salient skills among mentees and mentors and in the mentorship relationship as an essential resource for professional development, persistence, and scholarly achievement.

Indexed as

ColoradoEducationHumansMentoringMentorsProgram EvaluationResearch PersonnelSurveys and QuestionnairesTranslational Research, Biomedical

Identifiers

PMID31972672
PMCPMC7644265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.