Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31972556›Full record

ReviewPhysics in medicine and biology2020

An introduction to deep learning in medical physics: advantages, potential, and challenges.

Chenyang Shen, Dan Nguyen, Zhiguo Zhou, Steve B Jiang, Bin Dong, Xun Jia

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Physics in medicine and biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Sharing a whole-/total-body [Scientific data · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chenyang ShenMedical Artificial Intelligence and Automation (MAIA) Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6490-6555
Dan NguyenMedical Artificial Intelligence and Automation (MAIA) Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9590-0655
Zhiguo ZhouMedical Artificial Intelligence and Automation (MAIA) Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America.
Steve B JiangMedical Artificial Intelligence and Automation (MAIA) Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America.
Bin DongBeijing International Center for Mathematical Research (BICMR), Peking University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Xun JiaMedical Artificial Intelligence and Automation (MAIA) Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America.

Funding

Next generation small animal radiation research platformR37CA214639 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI JIA, XUN · 2018 to 2024
$3.8M
Intelligent treatment planning for cancer radiotherapyR01CA237269 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI JIA, XUN, JIANG, STEVE BIN · 2019 to 2023
$2.5M
Precise image guidance for liver cancer stereotactic body radiotherapy using element-resolved motion-compensated cone beam CTR01CA227289 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI JIA, XUN · 2018 to 2022
$2.0M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA227289NCI NIH HHS R01 CA237269NCI NIH HHS R37 CA214639
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As one of the most popular approaches in artificial intelligence, deep learning (DL) has attracted a lot of attention in the medical physics field over the past few years. The goals of this topical review article are twofold. First, we will provide an overview of the method to medical physics researchers interested in DL to help them start the endeavor. Second, we will give in-depth discussions on the DL technology to make researchers aware of its potential challenges and possible solutions. As such, we divide the article into two major parts. The first part introduces general concepts and principles of DL and summarizes major research resources, such as computational tools and databases. The second part discusses challenges faced by DL, present available methods to mitigate some of these challenges, as well as our recommendations.

Indexed as

Deep LearningPhysicsDiagnostic ImagingHumans

Identifiers

PMID31972556
PMCPMC7101509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.