Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31972054›Full record

ArticleCancer2020

Prediagnosis social support, social integration, living status, and colorectal cancer mortality in postmenopausal women from the women's health initiative.

Candyce H Kroenke, Electra D Paskett, Crystal W Cené, Bette J Caan, Juhua Luo, Aladdin H Shadyab, Jamaica R M Robinson, Rami Nassir, Dorothy S Lane, Garnet L Anderson

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer Survival Differences and Potential Geographic Determinants Among Men and Women in Utah.American Society of Clinical Oncology educational book. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Annual Meeting · 2022
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Candyce H KroenkeDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California.ORCID 0000-0002-6128-3118
Electra D PaskettDepartment of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Crystal W CenéDepartment of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Bette J CaanDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California.
Juhua LuoDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana.
Aladdin H ShadyabDepartment of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, California.
Jamaica R M RobinsonDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Rami NassirDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, University of California, Davis, California.
Dorothy S LaneDepartment of Family, Population, and Preventive Medicine, Renaissance School of Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York.
Garnet L AndersonDivision of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.
Kaiser Permanente · USFred Hutch Cancer Center · USIndiana University Bloomington · USStony Brook School · USThe Ohio State University · USUniversity of California, Davis · USUniversity of California San Diego · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Women's Health Initiative Cancer Survivor CohortUM1CA173642 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI ANDERSON, GARNET L., CAAN, BETTE J · 2013 to 2018
$12.1M
Life and Longevity After Cancer (LILAC): The Women's Health Initiative Cancer Survivor CohortU01CA173642 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI ANDERSON, GARNET L., PASKETT, ELECTRA D. · 2019 to 2023
$7.5M
Social networks, breast cancer treatment, and survivalK07CA187403 · NCI · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI KROENKE, CANDYCE H · 2015 to 2019
$914k
NCI NIH HHS K07 CA187403NCI NIH HHS U01 CA173642NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA173642NHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201600001CNHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201600002CNHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201600003CNHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201600004CNHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201600018C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe evaluated associations between perceived social support, social integration, living alone, and colorectal cancer (CRC) outcomes in postmenopausal women.

methodsThe study included 1431 women from the Women's Health Initiative who were diagnosed from 1993 through 2017 with stage I through IV CRC and who responded to the Medical Outcomes Study Social Support survey before their CRC diagnosis. We used proportional hazards regression to evaluate associations of social support (tertiles) and types of support, assessed up to 6 years before diagnosis, with overall and CRC-specific mortality. We also assessed associations of social integration and living alone with outcomes also in a subset of 1141 women who had information available on social ties (marital/partner status, community and religious participation) and living situation.

resultsIn multivariable analyses, women with low (hazard ratio [HR], 1.52; 95% CI, 1.23-1.88) and moderate (HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.98-1.50) perceived social support had significantly higher overall mortality than those with high support (P [continuous] < .001). Similarly, women with low (HR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.07-1.88) and moderate (HR, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.96-1.70) perceived social support had higher CRC mortality than those with high social support (P [continuous] = .007). Emotional, informational, and tangible support and positive interaction were all significantly associated with outcomes, whereas affection was not. In main-effects analyses, the level of social integration was related to overall mortality (P for trend = .02), but not CRC mortality (P for trend = .25), and living alone was not associated with mortality outcomes. However, both the level of social integration and living alone were related to outcomes in patients with rectal cancer.

conclusionsWomen with low perceived social support before diagnosis have higher overall and CRC-specific mortality.

Indexed as

AgedColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisPostmenopauseProportional Hazards ModelsRectal NeoplasmsRisk FactorsSocial IntegrationSocial SupportWomen's Healthcolorectal cancersocial networkssocial supportsocial tieswomen

Identifiers

PMID31972054
PMCPMC7297047
OpenAlexW3002456312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.