Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31971603›Full record

ReviewActa dermato-venereologica2020

Psoriasis and Genetics.

Nick Dand, Satveer K Mahil, Francesca Capon, Catherine H Smith, Michael A Simpson, Jonathan N Barker

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta dermato-venereologica, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 93 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
93citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

93 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. [Elephantine Psoriasis. A case report].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Evaluation ofMedical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

33 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nick Dand
Satveer K Mahil
Francesca Capon
Catherine H Smith
Michael A Simpson
Jonathan N Barker

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/S003126/1Medical Research Council MR/T02383X/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Psoriasis is a common inflammatory skin disease caused by the interplay between multiple genetic and environmental risk factors. This review summarises recent progress in elucidating the genetic basis of psoriasis, particularly through large genome-wide association studies. We illustrate the power of genetic analyses for disease stratification. Psoriasis can be stratified by phenotype (common plaque versus rare pustular variants), or by outcome (prognosis, comorbidities, response to treatment); recent progress has been made in delineating the genetic contribution in each of these areas. We also highlight how genetic data can directly inform the development of effective psoriasis treatments.

Indexed as

PhenotypeGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansPsoriasisTranslational Research, BiomedicalTreatment Outcomedisease progressiongeneticsprecision medicinepsoriasistreatment outcome

Identifiers

PMID31971603
PMCPMC9128944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.