Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31971556›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2020

The Genome of the Great Gerbil Reveals Species-Specific Duplication of an MHCII Gene.

Pernille Nilsson, Monica H Solbakken, Boris V Schmid, Russell J S Orr, Ruichen Lv, Yujun Cui, Yajun Song, Yujiang Zhang, Helle T Baalsrud, Ole K Tørresen and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Genetic diversity ofHeliyon · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A high-density genetic map and molecular sex-typing assay for gerbils.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Pernille NilssonCentre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis, Department of Biosciences, University of Oslo, Norway.
Monica H SolbakkenCentre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis, Department of Biosciences, University of Oslo, Norway.
Boris V SchmidCentre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis, Department of Biosciences, University of Oslo, Norway.
Russell J S OrrNatural History Museum, University of Oslo, Norway.
Ruichen LvState Key Laboratory of Pathogen and Biosecurity, Beijing Institute of Microbiology and Epidemiology, Beijing, China.
Yujun CuiState Key Laboratory of Pathogen and Biosecurity, Beijing Institute of Microbiology and Epidemiology, Beijing, China.
Yajun SongState Key Laboratory of Pathogen and Biosecurity, Beijing Institute of Microbiology and Epidemiology, Beijing, China.
Yujiang ZhangXinjiang Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Urumqi, China.
Helle T BaalsrudCentre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis, Department of Biosciences, University of Oslo, Norway.
Ole K TørresenCentre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis, Department of Biosciences, University of Oslo, Norway.
Nils Chr StensethCentre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis, Department of Biosciences, University of Oslo, Norway.
Ruifu YangState Key Laboratory of Pathogen and Biosecurity, Beijing Institute of Microbiology and Epidemiology, Beijing, China.
Kjetill S JakobsenCentre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis, Department of Biosciences, University of Oslo, Norway.
William Ryan EasterdayCentre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis, Department of Biosciences, University of Oslo, Norway.
Sissel JentoftCentre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis, Department of Biosciences, University of Oslo, Norway.
University of Oslo · NOInstitute of Microbiology · CNXinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region Disease Prevention and Control Center · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The great gerbil (Rhombomys opimus) is a social rodent living in permanent, complex burrow systems distributed throughout Central Asia, where it serves as the main host of several important vector-borne infectious pathogens including the well-known plague bacterium (Yersinia pestis). Here, we present a continuous annotated genome assembly of the great gerbil, covering over 96% of the estimated 2.47-Gb genome. Taking advantage of the recent genome assemblies of the sand rat (Psammomys obesus) and the Mongolian gerbil (Meriones unguiculatus), comparative immunogenomic analyses reveal shared gene losses within TLR gene families (i.e., TLR8, TLR10, and the entire TLR11-subfamily) for Gerbillinae, accompanied with signs of diversifying selection of TLR7 and TLR9. Most notably, we find a great gerbil-specific duplication of the MHCII DRB locus. In silico analyses suggest that the duplicated gene provides high peptide binding affinity for Yersiniae epitopes as well as Leishmania and Leptospira epitopes, putatively leading to increased capability to withstand infections by these pathogens. Our study demonstrates the power of whole-genome sequencing combined with comparative genomic analyses to gain deeper insight into the immunogenomic landscape of the great gerbil and its close relatives.

Indexed as

AnimalsEvolution, MolecularGene DuplicationGenomicsGerbillinaeHistocompatibility Antigens Class IIToll-Like Receptor 7Toll-Like Receptor 9YersiniaHistocompatibility Antigens Class IIToll-Like Receptor 7Toll-Like Receptor 9comparative genomicsgenome assemblygreat gerbilimmune gene evolutionMHC gene duplicationplague resistance

Identifiers

PMID31971556
PMCPMC7046166
OpenAlexW3000873225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.