Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31971506›Full record

Trial reportHealth technology assessment (Winchester, England)2020

A group intervention to improve quality of life for people with advanced dementia living in care homes: the Namaste feasibility cluster RCT.

Katherine Froggatt, Ashley Best, Frances Bunn, Girvan Burnside, Joanna Coast, Lesley Dunleavy, Claire Goodman, Ben Hardwick, Clare Jackson, Julie Kinley and 10 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Health technology assessment (Winchester, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Palliative care interventions in advanced dementia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  9. Namaste Care Family for people with dementia and family-A randomized controlled trial.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Katherine FroggattInternational Observatory on End of Life Care, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
Ashley BestClinical Trials Research Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Frances BunnDepartment of Health and Human Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK.
Girvan BurnsideClinical Trials Research Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Joanna CoastPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Lesley DunleavyInternational Observatory on End of Life Care, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
Claire GoodmanDepartment of Health and Human Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK.
Ben HardwickClinical Trials Research Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Clare JacksonClinical Trials Research Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Julie KinleyHospice UK, London, UK.
Anne Davidson LundPatient and public involvement member, UK.
Jennifer LynchDepartment of Health and Human Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK.
Paul MitchellPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Gareth MyringPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Shakil PatelLancashire Clinical Trials Unit, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK.
Guillermo Perez AlgortaInternational Observatory on End of Life Care, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
Nancy PrestonInternational Observatory on End of Life Care, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
David ScottPatient and public involvement member, UK.
Kate SilveraClinical Trials Research Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Catherine WalsheInternational Observatory on End of Life Care, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
University of Liverpool · GBLancaster University · GBUniversity of Bristol · GBUniversity of Hertfordshire · GBHospice UK · GBNational Institute for Health Research · GBUniversity of Lancashire · GB

Funding

Department of Health 08/1809/231Department of Health 11/1021/02Department of Health HTA/13/75/01Department of Health HTA/15/10/11Department of Health PB-PG-0906-11387
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople with advanced dementia who live and die in nursing homes experience variable quality of life, care and dying. There is a need to identify appropriate, cost-effective interventions that facilitate high-quality end-of-life care provision.

objectivesTo establish the feasibility and acceptability to staff and family of conducting a cluster randomised controlled trial of the Namaste Care intervention for people with advanced dementia in nursing homes.

designThe study had three phases: (1) realist review and (2) intervention refinement to inform the design of (3) a feasibility cluster randomised controlled trial with a process evaluation and economic analysis. Clusters (nursing homes) were randomised in a 3 : 1 ratio to intervention or control (usual care). The nature of the intervention meant that blinding was not possible.

settingNursing homes in England providing care for people with dementia.

participantsResidents with advanced dementia (assessed as having a Functional Assessment Staging Test score of 6 or 7), their informal carers and nursing home staff.

interventionNamaste Care is a complex group intervention that provides structured personalised care in a dedicated space, focusing on enhancements to the physical environment, comfort management and sensory engagement.

main outcome measuresThe two contender primary outcome measures were Comfort Assessment in Dying - End of Life Care in Dementia for quality of dying (dementia) and Quality of Life in Late Stage Dementia for quality of life. The secondary outcomes were as follows: person with dementia, sleep/activity (actigraphy), neuropsychiatric symptoms, agitation and pain; informal carers, satisfaction with care at the end of life; staff members, person-centred care assessment, satisfaction with care at the end of life and readiness for change; and other data - health economic outcomes, medication/service use and intervention activity.

resultsPhase 1 (realist review; 86 papers) identified that a key intervention component was the activities enabling the development of moments of connection. In phase 2, refinement of the intervention enabled the production of a user-friendly 16-page A4 booklet. In phase 3, eight nursing homes were recruited. Two homes withdrew before the intervention commenced; four intervention and two control homes completed the study. Residents with advanced dementia (

conclusionsA subsequent definitive trial is feasible if there are amendments to the recruitment process, outcome measure choice and intervention specification. FUTURE WORK: In a full trial, consideration is needed of the appropriate outcome measure that is sensitive to different participant responses, and of clear implementation principles for this person-centred intervention in a nursing home context.

trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN14948133.

fundingThis project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in

Indexed as

DementiaNursing HomesPatient-Centered CareAgedAged, 80 and overCost-Benefit AnalysisEnglandFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleQuality of LifeSeverity of Illness IndexSurveys and QuestionnairesTechnology Assessment, BiomedicalTerminal CareDEMENTIAEND-OF-LIFE CARENAMASTE CARENURSING HOMESQUALITY OF LIFE

Identifiers

PMID31971506
PMCPMC7008353
OpenAlexW3001884602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.