ArticleMedical physics2020
The state of gender diversity in medical physics.
Article in Medical physics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Balancing barriers: Family, career, and gender equality in radiation oncology and radiation research-An interdisciplinary prospective survey among the young workforce.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026Article
- Analysis of the institutional free market in accredited medical physics graduate programs.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025Article
- American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) chapter climate check: Mixed methods analysis of survey responses.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025Article
- Analyzing diversity trends in dermatology: A comprehensive overview.Journal of public health research · 2024Article
- Medical Physics Leadership Academy Journal Club (Leadership Club) program: Two-year review in building a community of leaders.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2023Article
- Equity, diversity, and inclusion topics at a medical physics residency journal club.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2023Article
- Gender-related and geographic trends in interactions between radiotherapy professionals on Twitter.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2022Article
- A qualitative investigation of resilience and well-being among medical physics residents.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2022Article
- Research productivity of radiation therapy physics faculty in the United States.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2021Article
- Increasing Diversity in Radiology and Molecular Imaging: Current Challenges.Molecular imaging and biology · 2021Review
- A framework for developing community-focused medical physics outreach programs.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2021Article
- Examining gender diversity growth as a model for inclusion of all underrepresented persons in medical physics.Medical physics · 2020Article
- Blinding of Residency Applications in Medical Physics: Promises and Pitfalls.Advances in radiation oncologyArticle
- Diversity and Professional Advancement in Medical Physics.Advances in radiation oncologyArticle
- Gender Equity in Radiation Oncology: Culture Change Is a Marathon, Not a Sprint.Advances in radiation oncologyArticle
- Gender Differences in Work-Life Integration Among Medical Physicists.Advances in radiation oncologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to quantify gender diversity in leadership positions within the field of medical physics, as well as within award categories and other recognitions by the American Association of Physicists in Medicine. The April 2019 PDF version of the AAPM membership directory was searched for all users self-reporting as holding a leadership position at their place of employment, those elected to leadership positions within the AAPM, those serving as chair of an AAPM council, and those listed as having received an award or other such recognition from AAPM (beginning in 1972 with the William D. Coolidge Award). Historical data for these categories were obtained from archived membership directories on the AAPM website. The AAPM website was also used to identify members who have served on the Medical Physics Editorial Board. The Commission on Accreditation of Medical Physics Education Programs (CAMPEP) website was used to identify the current directors of graduate and residency programs (as of July 2019). Because gender was not a reported field in any of these categories, gender was assigned by reviewing names and photographs. Percentage representation in these respects was compared to the overall percentage of women in the AAPM in 2019 (23.3%) and reported the number of women working as medical physicists globally (29.8%). Within the AAPM, the percentage of women reporting clinical leadership roles is 12.0% within the US, 13.6% in Canada, and 18.0% in all other countries combined. Women comprise only 7.5% of CAMPEP graduate program directors and 21.5% of residency program directors. The percentage of female presidents in AAPM is 8.1%. A woman has never served as Editor-in-Chief of Medical Physics, and the average for the past 10 yr for female board membership is 13.6%. With the exception of the John R. Cameron Young Investigators Symposium Award, the percentage of all female AAPM awardees is less than the percentage of women AAPM members. The lowest percentage of female representation within AAPM is among council chairs with only one woman having held a chair position out of 42 positions (2.4%) from 1970 to July 2019. Similar to the traditional discipline of physics, medical physics displays a clear gender disparity with regard to leadership positions, both within educational training programs and the AAPM. Further investigation into the demographics of the field and psychosocial factors affecting medical physicists may help to elucidate the origin of these disparities and inform strategies to address them.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.