Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31970776›Full record

ArticleJournal of surgical oncology2020

Higher lymph node harvest in patients with a pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal cancer is associated with improved survival.

Waseem Lutfi, Deirdre Martinez-Meehan, Rajeev Dhupar, Neil Christie, Inderpal Sarkaria, Chigozirim Ekeke, Nicholas Baker, James D Luketich, Olugbenga T Okusanya

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of surgical oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Waseem LutfiUniversity of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8327-4127
Deirdre Martinez-MeehanUniversity of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Rajeev DhuparUniversity of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Neil ChristieUniversity of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Inderpal SarkariaUniversity of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Chigozirim EkekeUniversity of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Nicholas BakerUniversity of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
James D LuketichUniversity of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Olugbenga T OkusanyaUniversity of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
University of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Postdoctoral Research Training in Biotherapy of CancerT32CA113263 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Udai S Kammula · 2006 to 2026
$3.6M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA113263
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesLymph node harvest during esophagectomy has been associated with improved survival for esophageal cancer but the value of enhanced lymph node harvest following complete pathologic response (pCR) is debated. This study investigated if increasing lymph node harvest in esophageal cancer patients with a pCR after neoadjuvant therapy and esophagectomy is associated with improved survival.

methodsWe queried the National Cancer Data Base for patients with esophageal cancer between 2004 and 2014 who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiation therapy followed by esophagectomy found to have pCR. Multivariable Cox modeling was utilized to evaluate the impact of increasing lymph node counts on overall survival (OS).

resultsA total of 1373 patients met inclusion criteria. A National Comprehensive Cancer Network compliant lymphadenectomy of ≥15 nodes was associated with improved survival (66.7% vs 51.1%; P < .001). Cox modeling showed that the first node cutoff to demonstrate a statistically significant improvement in OS was ≥7 nodes (hazard ratio [HR], 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.81, 0.68-0.97; 5-year OS: 54.2%) with a trend of decreasing and statistically significant HRs until ≥25 nodes (HR, 95% CI: 0.52, 0.37-0.72; 5-year OS: 68.4%).

conclusionsHigh negative node counts after neoadjuvant therapy and esophagectomy are associated with improved survival in patients with pCR.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAgedChemoradiotherapy, AdjuvantChemotherapy, AdjuvantEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophageal Squamous Cell CarcinomaFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLymph Node ExcisionLymph NodesMaleMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyProportional Hazards Modelscomplete pathologic responseesophageal canceresophagectomylymph node harvestneoadjuvant therapy

Identifiers

PMID31970776
PMCPMC9594626
OpenAlexW3002509307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.