Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31970614›Full record

ArticleJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2020

Management of venous thromboembolism in patients experiencing direct oral anticoagulant treatment failure: a single-center review of practice and outcomes.

Graham McIlroy, Neil Smith, Anand Lokare, Karen Beale, Charalampos Kartsios

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Graham McIlroyDepartment of Haematology, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Bordesley Green East, Birmingham, B9 5SS, UK. graham.mcilroy@doctors.org.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4731-1784
Neil SmithDepartment of Haematology, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Bordesley Green East, Birmingham, B9 5SS, UK.
Anand LokareDepartment of Haematology, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Bordesley Green East, Birmingham, B9 5SS, UK.
Karen BealeDepartment of Haematology, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Bordesley Green East, Birmingham, B9 5SS, UK.
Charalampos KartsiosDepartment of Haematology, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Bordesley Green East, Birmingham, B9 5SS, UK.
University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have gained in popularity over vitamin K antagonists for the treatment of venous thromboembolism, however their efficacy is not routinely monitored. It is therefore a clinical challenge to know how to respond when treatment with DOACs fails, and there is little formal guidance on how to manage these patients. We sought to characterize VTE patients who experienced DOAC failure at our institution, and rationalize subsequent treatment strategies. We collated the details of 54 consecutive patients with suboptimal response or breakthrough thrombosis on a DOAC, from our large specialist-led thrombosis clinic. Initial treatment changes were recorded, as well as long-term anticoagulation therapy and treatment outcomes. On first recognition of DOAC failure, 69% of patients were temporarily switched to therapeutic-dose low molecular weight heparin; most of the remaining patients were treated with an alternative DOAC regimen. After a limited period of parenteral treatment, 84% of patients returned to oral anticoagulation, the majority of whom experienced no further treatment failures. By the end of follow-up, 72% of patients were either on long-term DOAC therapy or had completed treatment altogether. In the absence of evidence or guidelines, brief rescue of anticoagulation with parenteral therapy can be an effective strategy when treatment with a DOAC fails.

Indexed as

AnticoagulantsHeparin, Low-Molecular-WeightTreatment FailureAdministration, OralAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesVenous ThromboembolismAnticoagulantsHeparin, Low-Molecular-WeightAnticoagulantsAntithrombinsFactor Xa inhibitorsTreatment failureVenous thromboembolism

Identifiers

PMID31970614
OpenAlexW3001767832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.