Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31970587›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical psychology in medical settings2020

The Impact of a Gluten-Free Diet on Celiac Disease: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Two Cases Using NIH Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMIS, NTCB, and Neuro-QoL).

Jeffrey E Cassisi, Emily J Ross, Helize Vivier, Nicholas James, Le-Chu Su

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Introduction to the Special Issue: Advances in Psychogastroenterology.Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jeffrey E CassisiDepartment of Psychology, University of Central Florida, Orlando, USA. Jeffrey.Cassisi@ucf.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-2288-5690
Emily J RossDepartment of Psychology, University of Central Florida, Orlando, USA.
Helize VivierDepartment of Psychology, University of Central Florida, Orlando, USA.
Nicholas JamesDepartment of Psychology, University of Central Florida, Orlando, USA.
Le-Chu SuDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Central Florida, Orlando, USA.
University of Central Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study is to demonstrate the effectiveness of the gluten-free diet (GFD) for celiac disease (CD) in a multidisciplinary outpatient Gastroenterology clinic with two adult cases using the innovative, paradigm-shifting measurement systems: The NIH Patient reported outcome measures (PROs). CD results in gastrointestinal (GI) dysfunction, but is also associated with other inflammatory responses, psychosocial impairment, and cognitive deficits such as "brain fog." Adherence to the GFD for 6 months was associated with improvement in specific GI symptoms in one case (PROMIS-GI; Case 2) and improvement in cognitive functioning (NIH Toolbox Cognitive Battery) and psychosocial functioning (Neuro-QOL) in both cases. Notably, improvement in cognitive flexibility occurred in both younger and an older adult patient. This suggests that cognitive decline and the psychosocial deficits associated with CD are reversible with GFD. The NIH PROs were found to be effective, sensitive to change, and minimally disruptive to clinic operations.

Indexed as

AgedCeliac DiseaseDiet, Gluten-FreeFemaleHumansMalePatient CompliancePatient Reported Outcome MeasuresQuality of LifeThiocyanatesYoung Adult2-nitro-5-thiocyanobenzoic acidThiocyanatesCeliac diseaseGluten-free dietNIH toolboxNTCBPROMIS

Identifiers

PMID31970587
OpenAlexW3002610602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.