ReviewHeart failure reviews2020
Assessment and management of heart failure in the systemic right ventricle.
Review in Heart failure reviews, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reduced Ejection Fraction of the Systemic Right Ventricle and Severe Tricuspid Regurgitation: Medication or Surgery?Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Article
- [Initial care and stabilization of ACHD patients : Teamwork improves outcomes].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2025Review
- Pathogenesis and Surgical Treatment of Dextro-Transposition of the Great Arteries (D-TGA): Part II.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Approach to Decompensated Right Heart Failure in the Acute Setting.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Heart Failure in Complex Congenital Heart Disease of the Adult.Current cardiology reports · 2022Review
- Heartmate 3 as a bridge to heart transplantation in a patient with congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries: a case report.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2022Article
- The success and failure of the adult congenital heart.Heart failure reviews · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transposition of the great arteries (TGA) is a common congenital cardiac malformation, in which many patients survive into adulthood. From the 1960s through much of the 1980s, the majority of those with D-TGA were repaired with an atrial switch procedure, in which the right ventricle (RV) remains the systemic ventricle. Congenitally corrected TGA patients often remain with a systemic RV. In these patients, heart failure risks result from residual sequelae of childhood repair, which often include tricuspid regurgitation, RV failure, and atrial and ventricular arrhythmias. Imaging techniques, including echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, multi-detector computed tomography, and radionuclide ventriculography focus on evaluation of anatomy and function as both diagnostic and prognostic tools. Biomarkers are used for risk stratification. Structural and surgical interventions are targeted for palliation and prevention of further decompensation in conjunction with pharmacologic, ablative, and device-based therapies for acute and chronic management of heart failure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.