Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31970530›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care2020

Cost-effectiveness of midostaurin in the treatment of newly diagnosed FLT3-mutated acute myeloid leukemia in France.

Gabriel Tremblay, Clemence Cariou, Christian Recher, Mike Dolph, Patricia Brandt, Anne-Sandrine Blanc, Anna Forsythe

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Gabriel TremblayPurple Squirrel Economics, New York, USA.
Clemence CariouNovartis Pharmaceuticals, Rueil-Malmaison, France.
Christian RecherService d'Hématologie, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse Oncopole-Centre Hospitalier Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Mike DolphPurple Squirrel Economics, New York, USA.
Patricia BrandtNovartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, USA.
Anne-Sandrine BlancNovartis Pharmaceuticals, Rueil-Malmaison, France.
Anna ForsythePurple Squirrel Economics, New York, USA. annaforsythe@pshta.com.
Novartis (France) · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse · FRNovartis (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMidostaurin (MIDO) combined with standard chemotherapy was approved by the European Medicines Agency in 2017 for the treatment of adults with newly diagnosed FLT3-mutated acute myeloid leukemia (AML) based on results from the RATIFY trial.

methodsA cost-effectiveness model was developed to compare MIDO and standard-of-care (SOC) to SOC alone in France. Per Haute Autorité de Santé (HAS) guidelines, a partitioned survival model with eight health states was used: diagnosis/induction, complete remission, relapse, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), HSCT recovery, post-HSCT recovery (stabilized after HSCT recovery), post-HSCT relapse, and mortality. A lifetime horizon was used beginning at diagnosis with a "cure model,", which assumed natural mortality after trial cut-off. Utility values were obtained from a systematic literature review and included disutilities. Resource utilization was based on HAS clinical guidelines and a survey of French physicians and included drugs and administration, adverse events, routine medical care, HSCT, and end-of-life care costs.

resultsIn RATIFY and after extrapolation, MIDO improved survival compared to SOC, translating into MIDO-treated patients gaining 1.12 life years (LYs) and 1.23 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) versus SOC. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for MIDO versus SOC was €68,781 per LY and €62,305 per QALY. Sensitivity analyses showed consistency with base case findings.

conclusionsMIDO represents a clinically significant advancement in the management of newly diagnosed FLT3-mutated AML. In this analysis, MIDO add-on therapy showed gains in LYs and QALYs versus SOC alone and was found to be a cost-effective option at a €100,000 per QALY threshold for end-of-life treatment.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCost-Benefit Analysisfms-Like Tyrosine Kinase 3FranceHealth ExpendituresHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteModels, EconometricQuality-Adjusted Life YearsRecurrenceRemission InductionStaurosporineAntineoplastic AgentsFLT3 protein, humanfms-Like Tyrosine Kinase 3midostaurinStaurosporineAcute myeloid leukemiaCost-effectiveness analysisFMS-like tyrosine kinase 3Incremental cost-effectiveness ratioLife yearsQuality-adjusted life years

Identifiers

PMID31970530
OpenAlexW3000821901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.