ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2020
Biological variation of arginine vasopressin.
Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Arginine-vasopressin systems in autistic phenotype schizophrenia: effect of a genetic variant of AVPR1a and AVPR1b.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2026Article
- Effect of Arginine Vasopressin on Human Neutrophil Function Under Physiological and Sepsis-Associated Conditions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThere is growing interest in the measurement of plasma levels of arginine vasopressin (AVP) for the assessment of mild dehydration. However, the principles of biological variation have not been applied to the study of AVP and understanding biological variation of AVP may provide insights regarding measurement thresholds. The purpose of this investigation was to determine the biological variation of AVP in healthy euhydrated individuals to understand the potential for establishing both static and/or change thresholds of importance.
methodsWe studied 29 healthy volunteers (24 men and 5 women) while controlling for hydration and pre-analytical factors. All subjects completed between 2-8 trials where biological variation was determined using widely published methods. We determined the intraindividual, interindividual, and analytical coefficients of variation (CV
resultsAVP did not reach the IH threshold required to be considered useful in the dynamic assessment of physiological deviations from normal. AVP levels approached the II threshold required to be considered useful in the static assessment of physiological deviations from normal.
conclusionsThis analysis demonstrates that AVP assessment is unlikely to yield useful information about hydration status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.