ArticleHeart and vessels2020
Predictive value of the geriatric nutritional risk index in percutaneous coronary intervention with rotational atherectomy.
Article in Heart and vessels, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Outcomes and other characteristics of the nutritional screening and assessment tools validation processes in hospitalized adults: a systematic review.Einstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2026Pooled it
- Predictive Value of Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in nutrition · 2021Pooled it
- Clinical expert consensus document on rotational atherectomy from the Japanese association of cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics: update 2026.Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics · 2026Review
- Geriatric nutritional risk index as a predictor of outcomes in elderly patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
- Prognostic value of geriatric nutritional risk index in patients with stable coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2024Article
- The Predictive Value of Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index Combined with the GRACE Score in Predicting the Risk of One Year Poor Prognosis in Elderly Patients with Non-ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction After PCI.Clinical interventions in aging · 2024Article
- Clinical expert consensus document on rotational atherectomy from the Japanese association of cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics: update 2023.Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics · 2023Review
- Geriatric nutritional risk index predicts all-cause mortality in the oldest-old patients with acute coronary syndrome: A 10-year cohort study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2023Article
- Nutritional Risk Index Improves the GRACE Score Prediction of Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The prognostic value of the geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with rotational atherectomy (RA) remains unknown. Therefore, we aimed to clarify whether the GNRI could predict major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in patients undergoing PCI with RA. A total of 206 patients who underwent PCI with RA from January 2009 to December 2017 were retrospectively tracked. The patients were divided into 2 groups based on the GNRI value on admission. MACE comprised all-cause death, target lesion revascularization (TLR), target vessel revascularization (TVR), and myocardial infarction. One year of follow up was completed in 95.6% of patients. During this period, 50 cases of MACE were observed (all-cause death, 32 cases; TLR, 21 cases; and TVR, 2 cases). Patients with a low GNRI (< 98) had a significantly higher incidence of MACE than did patients with a high GNRI (≥ 98) (37.9% vs. 15.5%, log-rank p < 0.05). The GNRI was an independent predictor of MACE (hazard ratio, 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.92-0.97). Furthermore, the GNRI had better predictive power than did its components alone (i.e. body mass index and serum albumin level) (net-reclassification improvement, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.07-0.71; p = 0.01; integrated discrimination improvement, 0.02; 95% CI, - 0.01-0.04; p = 0.07). The GNRI on admission is a predictor of MACE after PCI with RA. Further studies are required to determine whether intensive medical therapy could improve clinical events, particularly cardiovascular death and revascularization, in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31970508What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.