SynthesisEuropean journal of pediatrics2020
Efficacy of double versus single phototherapy in treatment of neonatal jaundice: a meta-analysis.
Synthesis in European journal of pediatrics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of irradiance and delivery configuration on phototherapy efficacy in preterm infants: a network meta-analysis and meta-regression of randomized trials.BMC pediatrics · 2026Pooled it
- Intensive versus conventional phototherapy for neonatal hyperbilirubinemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs and cohort studies.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Multi-directional phototherapy vs. unidirectional phototherapy from below for severe neonatal jaundice: a randomized pilot trial in home phototherapy.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Trial
- Single-surface Intensive Phototherapy or Double-Surface Intensive Phototherapy in Neonatal Non-Hemolytic Hyperbilirubinemia: A Comparison of Effectiveness and Complications.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2021Article
- Letter to the Editor on the original article "Efficacy of double versus single phototherapy in treatment of neonatal jaundice: a meta-analysis" by MA Nizam et al.European journal of pediatrics · 2020Article
- Reply to correspondence letter by Dr Sivanandan S and Dr Thukral A.European journal of pediatrics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To assess the efficacy of double phototherapy in managing neonatal jaundice compared to single phototherapy in infants with different birth weight and gestational age. CENTRAL, PubMed, clinicaltrials.gov, and gray literature sources were searched from date of inception of these databases till August 2019. Primary outcome was decline of total serum bilirubin (TSB) per hour. Ten studies were eligible. Our meta-analysis showed significant difference between double phototherapy versus single phototherapy in decline of TSB per hour in preterm infants (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 2.28 [0.79-3.76], p = 0.003) and a significant decrease in TSB levels at 24 h of phototherapy in infants with birth weight ≥ 1500 g (mean difference [MD] = - 61.70 μmol/L, [- 107.96, - 15.43], p = <0.001).Conclusion: Double phototherapy is effective in reducing TSB in infants of different gestational ages and birth weights with the most important finding regarding preterm infants, who are more susceptible to kernicterus.What is Known:• Double phototherapy has shown to be more efficacious than single phototherapy in treating neonatal jaundice.• Double phototherapy efficacy on neonates with different gestational ages and birth weights still remain ambiguous in treating neonatal jaundice.What is New:• The results of this meta-analysis show that double phototherapy is effective in reducing TSB in infants of different gestational ages and birth weights with the most important finding regarding preterm infants, who are more susceptible to kernicterus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.