Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31969784›Full record

ArticleEthnicity & disease2020

Comparisons and Approaches of PREP Programs at Different Stages of Maturity: Challenges, Best Practices and Benefits.

Nancy B Schwartz, Laurie E Risner, Miriam Domowicz, Victoria H Freedman

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ethnicity & disease, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Centering Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Graduate Admissions.Journal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nancy B SchwartzDepartment of Pediatrics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
Laurie E RisnerDepartment of Pediatrics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
Miriam DomowiczDepartment of Pediatrics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
Victoria H FreedmanAlbert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY.
University of Chicago · USAlbert Einstein College of Medicine · US

Funding

UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO PREPR25GM066522 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI CARRILLO, ROBERT ARNULFO, RANDALL, GLENN C · 2004 to 2024
$6.7M
Einstein Postbaccalaureate Research Education ProgramR25GM104547 · NIGMS · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, INC · PI AKABAS, MYLES H. · 2013 to 2023
$4.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R25 GM066522NIGMS NIH HHS R25 GM104547
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Postbaccalaureate Research Education Programs (PREP) are designed to provide research training and educational opportunities for recent baccalaureate graduates from targeted groups defined by NIH who would benefit by academic enhancements between the completion of undergraduate studies and admission to a PhD program. These programs offer exposure to the biomedical science community in a way that helps post-undergraduate individuals visualize future careers as well-trained, enthusiastic leaders in biomedical research who represent and will promote diversity in science. Specifically, PREPs provide the preparation and skills required for entrance into, and successful completion of, a PhD program via in-depth exposure to a research setting, which helps to refine the post-undergraduate's research interests, assists in providing a realistic understanding of the end results one can expect from research, and offers a forum for discussion with lab peers and mentors about possible career paths. Beyond the lab, PREPs offer programmatic activities to develop analytical, writing, and oral presentation skills necessary for a competitive graduate school application and success in graduate school thereafter. Individual mentoring increases the post-undergraduate's confidence and familiarity with members of the research community, so that pursuit of a PhD becomes a realistic and less-intimidating path. Interventions and developmental activities are matched to the background preparation, research experience, and learning style of each post-undergraduate. As with all training programs, there is no perfect model and each program must fit in and adapt to their respective institutional environments and cultures. Thus, in this article, we provide perspectives and approaches developed by a long-standing program in existence almost since the beginning of the PREP program along with one PREP at an early stage of maturity, having just been through one renewal.

Indexed as

Biological Science DisciplinesBiomedical ResearchCurriculumEducational StatusEducation, GraduateHumansMentoringMentorsProgram EvaluationDiversityInterventionMentoringPost-baccalaureateResearchSTEM

Identifiers

PMID31969784
PMCPMC6970524
OpenAlexW3000678824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.