Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31969774›Full record

ArticleJournal of cleaner production2020

Assessing alternative crop establishment methods with a sustainability lens in rice production systems of Eastern India.

Krishna Prasad Devkota, Sudhir-Yadav, C M Khanda, Sarah J Beebout, Bidhan K Mohapatra, Grant R Singleton, Ranjitha Puskur

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cleaner production, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Exploring the potential ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Krishna Prasad DevkotaInternational Rice Research Institute, DAPO Box 7777, Metro Manila, 1301, Philippines.
Sudhir-YadavInternational Rice Research Institute, DAPO Box 7777, Metro Manila, 1301, Philippines.
C M KhandaOrissa University of Agriculture and Technology, Bhubaneswar, India.
Sarah J BeeboutInternational Rice Research Institute, DAPO Box 7777, Metro Manila, 1301, Philippines.
Bidhan K MohapatraInternational Rice Research Institute, DAPO Box 7777, Metro Manila, 1301, Philippines.
Grant R SingletonInternational Rice Research Institute, DAPO Box 7777, Metro Manila, 1301, Philippines.
Ranjitha PuskurInternational Rice Research Institute, DAPO Box 7777, Metro Manila, 1301, Philippines.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sustainability of rice production systems is a prime concern for Asia to maintain food security and to support economic growth. This gain in productivity not only depends on agricultural inputs but also depends on social and environmental factors. To address these emerging issues, new resource- and capital-efficient and profitable technologies have been introduced. The conventional method of rice production (puddling and manual transplanting, PTR) is considered as highly input intensive. As an alternative, dry direct seeded rice (DSR) using seed drill has been promoted to save labor and production costs compared with PTR. Similarly, machine transplanted rice (MTR) has been also considered and promoted in many rice growing countries of South and East Asia. Economic, environmental, and social performances of DSR and MTR (alternative rice establishment technologies) were compared to the PTR using Sustainable Rice Platform (SRP) defined 12 Performance Indicators (PIs) (version 1.0) as a gauge to measure their sustainability. For that, a household survey was conducted on 652 households in Odisha India during 2016. The gaps, i.e., the target to achieve better sustainability, were computed for most of the indicators from the difference between top 10th percentile and the population mean value of the indicator. The results indicated a yield gap of 1.35 t ha

Indexed as

Dry direct seeded riceEnvironmental footprintsMachine transplanted riceSustainability indicatorsSynergies and trade-off

Identifiers

PMID31969774
PMCPMC6946438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.