Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31969764›Full record

SynthesisActa clinica Croatica2019

INFERTILITY AND SEXUAL DYSFUNCTIONS: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW.

Andrej Starc, Manca Trampuš, Doroteja Pavan Jukić, Cecilija Rotim, Tomislav Jukić, Ana Polona Mivšek

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Acta clinica Croatica, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 76 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
76citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

76 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Andrej Starc1Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia; 2Jesenice General Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, Jesenice, Slovenia; 3Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Faculty of Medicine, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Osijek, Croatia; 4Dr Andrija Štampar Teaching Institute of Public Health, Zagreb, Croatia; 5Department of Internal Medicine, Family Medicine and History of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Osijek, Croatia; 6Department of Midwifery, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Manca Trampuš1Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia; 2Jesenice General Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, Jesenice, Slovenia; 3Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Faculty of Medicine, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Osijek, Croatia; 4Dr Andrija Štampar Teaching Institute of Public Health, Zagreb, Croatia; 5Department of Internal Medicine, Family Medicine and History of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Osijek, Croatia; 6Department of Midwifery, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Doroteja Pavan Jukić1Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia; 2Jesenice General Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, Jesenice, Slovenia; 3Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Faculty of Medicine, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Osijek, Croatia; 4Dr Andrija Štampar Teaching Institute of Public Health, Zagreb, Croatia; 5Department of Internal Medicine, Family Medicine and History of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Osijek, Croatia; 6Department of Midwifery, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Cecilija Rotim1Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia; 2Jesenice General Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, Jesenice, Slovenia; 3Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Faculty of Medicine, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Osijek, Croatia; 4Dr Andrija Štampar Teaching Institute of Public Health, Zagreb, Croatia; 5Department of Internal Medicine, Family Medicine and History of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Osijek, Croatia; 6Department of Midwifery, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Tomislav Jukić1Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia; 2Jesenice General Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, Jesenice, Slovenia; 3Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Faculty of Medicine, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Osijek, Croatia; 4Dr Andrija Štampar Teaching Institute of Public Health, Zagreb, Croatia; 5Department of Internal Medicine, Family Medicine and History of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Osijek, Croatia; 6Department of Midwifery, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Ana Polona Mivšek1Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia; 2Jesenice General Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, Jesenice, Slovenia; 3Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Faculty of Medicine, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Osijek, Croatia; 4Dr Andrija Štampar Teaching Institute of Public Health, Zagreb, Croatia; 5Department of Internal Medicine, Family Medicine and History of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Osijek, Croatia; 6Department of Midwifery, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate whether infertility and its treatment affect couple sexuality. A systematic literature review was performed, focusing on female and male sexual dysfunctions due to infertility. The method was descriptive, using a meta-synthesis of scientific research published between 2012 and 2017 in the English language. The search for suitable studies was carried out with the research databases Medline, CINAHL, PubMed and ScienceDirect using the following keywords: infertility, sexual dysfunctions, couple. It can be concluded that infertility negatively affects the sexuality of an infertile couple, which is further proven by a high percentage of sexual dysfunctions (43%-90% among women and 48%-58% among men). Couples report less satisfaction with sexuality. Since lower satisfaction and dysfunctions are closely connected with infertility and its treatment, couples might benefit from sexual therapy and support during the process of infertility treatment. Further research should focus on the evaluation of different psychological interventions that would address sexuality in couples when diagnosed and treated for infertility.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansInfertilityMaleMiddle AgedSexual BehaviorSexual Dysfunction, PhysiologicalSexual Dysfunctions, PsychologicalSexualityErectile dysfunctionInfertilitySexual dysfunctions, psychologicalSexuality

Identifiers

PMID31969764
PMCPMC6971809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.