Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31969718›Full record

ArticleHeredity2020

Genomic prediction for hastening and improving efficiency of forward selection in conifer polycross mating designs: an example from white spruce.

Patrick R N Lenz, Simon Nadeau, Aïda Azaiez, Sébastien Gérardi, Marie Deslauriers, Martin Perron, Nathalie Isabel, Jean Beaulieu, Jean Bousquet

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heredity, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Parallel genetic and phenotypic differentiation ofFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Patrick R N Lenz *Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Wood Fibre Centre, 1055 rue Du PEPS, P.O. Box 10380, QC, G1V 4C7, Canada. Patrick.Lenz@canada.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0184-9247
Simon Nadeau *Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Wood Fibre Centre, 1055 rue Du PEPS, P.O. Box 10380, QC, G1V 4C7, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3519-4998
Aïda AzaiezCanada Research Chair in Forest Genomics, Institute of Systems and Integrative Biology, and Centre for Forest Research, Université Laval, 1030 Avenue de la Médecine, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada.
Sébastien GérardiCanada Research Chair in Forest Genomics, Institute of Systems and Integrative Biology, and Centre for Forest Research, Université Laval, 1030 Avenue de la Médecine, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada.
Marie DeslauriersNatural Resources Canada, Canadian Wood Fibre Centre, 1055 rue Du PEPS, P.O. Box 10380, QC, G1V 4C7, Canada.
Martin PerronCanada Research Chair in Forest Genomics, Institute of Systems and Integrative Biology, and Centre for Forest Research, Université Laval, 1030 Avenue de la Médecine, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada.
Nathalie IsabelCanada Research Chair in Forest Genomics, Institute of Systems and Integrative Biology, and Centre for Forest Research, Université Laval, 1030 Avenue de la Médecine, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada.
Jean BeaulieuCanada Research Chair in Forest Genomics, Institute of Systems and Integrative Biology, and Centre for Forest Research, Université Laval, 1030 Avenue de la Médecine, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada.
Jean BousquetCanada Research Chair in Forest Genomics, Institute of Systems and Integrative Biology, and Centre for Forest Research, Université Laval, 1030 Avenue de la Médecine, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada.
Forest Research · GBNatural Resources Canada · CAInstitut National de Recherche Forestière · DZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic selection (GS) has a large potential for improving the prediction accuracy of breeding values and significantly reducing the length of breeding cycles. In this context, the choice of mating designs becomes critical to improve the efficiency of breeding operations and to obtain the largest genetic gains per time unit. Polycross mating designs have been traditionally used in tree and plant breeding to perform backward selection of the female parents. The possibility to use genetic markers for paternity identification and for building genomic prediction models should allow for a broader use of polycross tests in forward selection schemes. We compared the accuracies of genomic predictions of offspring's breeding values from a polycross and a full-sib (partial diallel) mating design with similar genetic background in white spruce (Picea glauca). Trees were phenotyped for growth and wood quality traits, and genotyped for 4092 SNPs representing as many gene loci distributed across the 12 spruce chromosomes. For the polycross progeny test, heritability estimates were smaller, but more precise using the genomic BLUP (GBLUP) model as compared with pedigree-based models accounting for the maternal pedigree or for the reconstructed full pedigree. Cross-validations showed that GBLUP predictions were 22-52% more accurate than predictions based on the maternal pedigree, and 5-7% more accurate than predictions using the reconstructed full pedigree. The accuracies of GBLUP predictions were high and in the same range for most traits between the polycross (0.61-0.70) and full-sib progeny tests (0.61-0.74). However, higher genetic gains per time unit were expected from the polycross mating design given the shorter time needed to conduct crosses. Considering the operational advantages of the polycross design in terms of easier handling of crosses and lower associated costs for test establishment, we believe that this mating scheme offers great opportunities for the development and operational application of forward GS.

Indexed as

Crosses, GeneticPiceaPlant BreedingSelection, GeneticGenomicsModels, GeneticPhenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotideTracheophyta

Identifiers

PMID31969718
PMCPMC7080810
OpenAlexW3000749006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.