ArticleHeredity2020
Genomic prediction for hastening and improving efficiency of forward selection in conifer polycross mating designs: an example from white spruce.
Article in Heredity, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genomic selection validated across two generations of loblolly pine breeding.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
- Seasonal Variation and Genetic Evaluation of Needle Catechin Content in Half-Sib Families ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- Breeding for climate adaptation: genetic variation and genomic selection for drought response in Scots pine.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Application and development prospect of genomic selection breeding in coniferous trees.Planta · 2025Review
- Low-input breeding potential in stone pine, a multipurpose forest tree with low genome diversity.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Genomic selection in forest trees comes to life: unraveling its potential in an advanced four-generationFrontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Genomic selection for growth characteristics in Korean red pine (Frontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Increasing genomic prediction accuracy for unphenotyped full-sib families by modeling additive and dominance effects with large datasets in white spruce.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Genomic selection reveals hidden relatedness and increased breeding efficiency in western redcedar polycross breeding.Evolutionary applications · 2022Article
- Metadata analysis indicates biased estimation of genetic parameters and gains using conventional pedigree information instead of genomic-based approaches in tree breeding.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Breeding for adaptation to climate change: genomic selection for drought response in a white spruce multi-site polycross test.Evolutionary applications · 2022Article
- Parallel genetic and phenotypic differentiation ofFrontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Achievements and Challenges of Genomics-Assisted Breeding in Forest Trees: From Marker-Assisted Selection to Genome Editing.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- SNP-based analysis reveals unexpected features of genetic diversity, parental contributions and pollen contamination in a white spruce breeding program.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- The Genetic Basis of Tomato Aroma.Genes · 2021Review
- Genomic Predictions With Nonadditive Effects Improved Estimates of Additive Effects and Predictions of Total Genetic Values inFrontiers in plant science · 2021Article
- Genomic selection for resistance to spruce budworm in white spruce and relationships with growth and wood quality traits.Evolutionary applications · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genomic selection (GS) has a large potential for improving the prediction accuracy of breeding values and significantly reducing the length of breeding cycles. In this context, the choice of mating designs becomes critical to improve the efficiency of breeding operations and to obtain the largest genetic gains per time unit. Polycross mating designs have been traditionally used in tree and plant breeding to perform backward selection of the female parents. The possibility to use genetic markers for paternity identification and for building genomic prediction models should allow for a broader use of polycross tests in forward selection schemes. We compared the accuracies of genomic predictions of offspring's breeding values from a polycross and a full-sib (partial diallel) mating design with similar genetic background in white spruce (Picea glauca). Trees were phenotyped for growth and wood quality traits, and genotyped for 4092 SNPs representing as many gene loci distributed across the 12 spruce chromosomes. For the polycross progeny test, heritability estimates were smaller, but more precise using the genomic BLUP (GBLUP) model as compared with pedigree-based models accounting for the maternal pedigree or for the reconstructed full pedigree. Cross-validations showed that GBLUP predictions were 22-52% more accurate than predictions based on the maternal pedigree, and 5-7% more accurate than predictions using the reconstructed full pedigree. The accuracies of GBLUP predictions were high and in the same range for most traits between the polycross (0.61-0.70) and full-sib progeny tests (0.61-0.74). However, higher genetic gains per time unit were expected from the polycross mating design given the shorter time needed to conduct crosses. Considering the operational advantages of the polycross design in terms of easier handling of crosses and lower associated costs for test establishment, we believe that this mating scheme offers great opportunities for the development and operational application of forward GS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.