Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31969687›Full record

Trial reportSpinal cord2020

Co-development of a physiotherapist-delivered physical activity intervention for adults with spinal cord injury.

Jasmin K Ma, Oren Cheifetz, Kendra R Todd, Carole Chebaro, Sen Hoong Phang, Robert B Shaw, Kyle J Whaley, Kathleen A Martin Ginis

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Spinal cord, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04493606 (Implementation of the ProACTIVE Toolkit in the Hospital and Community Setting to Improve Physical Activity Among People With Spinal Cord Injury), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04493606 naunknown statusnot on this map

Implementation of the ProACTIVE Toolkit in the Hospital and Community Setting to Improve Physical Activity Among People With Spinal Cord Injury

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of British ColumbiaRan2020 to 2023Enrolled38ConditionsSpinal Cord InjuriesArmsSCI ProACTIVE Coaching (objective 1), Implementation Intervention (objective 2)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Mapping the role of patient and public involvement during the different stages of healthcare innovation: A scoping review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jasmin K MaSchool of Health and Exercise Sciences, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC, Canada. Jasmin.ma@ubc.ca.
Oren CheifetzHematology/Oncology Program, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Kendra R ToddSchool of Health and Exercise Sciences, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC, Canada.
Carole ChebaroNeurocore Physiotherapy & Pilates Centre, Richmond Hill, ON, Canada.
Sen Hoong PhangPropel Physiotherapy, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Robert B ShawSchool of Health and Exercise Sciences, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC, Canada.
Kyle J WhaleyPropel Physiotherapy, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Kathleen A Martin GinisSchool of Health and Exercise Sciences, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7076-3594
University of British Columbia · CACanadian Physiotherapy Association · CAHamilton Health Sciences · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

study designsCross-sectional survey, semi-structured interview, and randomized-controlled trial.

objectivesOptimal spinal cord injury (SCI)-specific PA intervention strategies appropriate for the physiotherapist setting are unknown. The purpose of this paper is to describe the rigorous co-development process of a theory-based, physiotherapist-led PA intervention for people with SCI and assess its feasibility for implementation in the rehabilitation setting.

settingCommunity.

methodsCo-development of the intervention included (1) a review of the literature; (2) key informant interviews with people with SCI (n = 26); (3) a national online survey of physiotherapists' barriers, needs, and preferences (n = 239); (4) a review of the evidence and recommendations for the intervention from a stakeholder expert panel (n = 13); and (5) a randomized controlled trial of intervention training and its effects on implementation determinants amongst physiotherapists (n = 20).

resultsAlmost 300 people with SCI and physiotherapists were engaged in the intervention development process. Optimal intervention delivery should be tailored and include (1) education on safety, PA guidelines, and behaviour change techniques, (2) referral to other peers, local programmes, and health professionals, and (3) adapted exercise prescriptions. Following intervention implementation training, physiotherapists demonstrated stronger tested and perceived knowledge, skills, resources, and confidence for promoting PA to people with SCI, ps < 0.05.

conclusionsThis development process serves as an example methodology for using theory to co-create a leisure-time physical activity behaviour change intervention tailored for people with SCI.

Indexed as

ExerciseExercise TherapyLeisure ActivitiesNeurological RehabilitationPhysical TherapistsStakeholder ParticipationAdultBehavior TherapyCross-Sectional StudiesFeasibility StudiesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansPatient Education as TopicProfessional CompetenceSpinal Cord Injuries

Identifiers

PMID31969687
OpenAlexW3000938106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.