Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31969612›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

A Multi-Omics Interpretable Machine Learning Model Reveals Modes of Action of Small Molecules.

Natasha L Patel-Murray, Miriam Adam, Nhan Huynh, Brook T Wassie, Pamela Milani, Ernest Fraenkel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Integrative modeling of the cell.Acta biochimica et biophysica Sinica · 2022
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Interpreting machine learning models to investigate circadian regulation and facilitate exploration of clock function.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Translational precision medicine: an industry perspective.Journal of translational medicine · 2021
    Review
  16. Review
  17. The remodel of the "central dogma": a metabolomics interaction perspective.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2021
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Incorporating Machine Learning into Established Bioinformatics Frameworks.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Natasha L Patel-MurrayComputational and Systems Biology Graduate Program, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.
Miriam AdamDepartment of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.
Nhan HuynhDepartment of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.
Brook T WassieDepartment of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.
Pamela MilaniDepartment of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.
Ernest FraenkelDepartment of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA. fraenkel-admin@mit.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9249-8181
Massachusetts Institute of Technology · USBroad Institute · US

Funding

Neuron and Glial Cellular Signatures from Normal and Diseased iPS Cells-SupplementU54NS091046 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI FINKBEINER, STEVEN M, FRAENKEL, ERNEST · 2014 to 2020
$11.7M
Epigenetic Pathology and Therapy in Huntington's DiseaseR01NS089076 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI FRAENKEL, ERNEST, HOUSMAN, DAVID · 2015 to 2024
$4.9M
Graduate Training in Computational and Systems BiologyT32GM087237 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI BURGE, CHRISTOPHER B · 2009 to 2023
$4.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM087237NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS089076NINDS NIH HHS U54 NS091046
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-throughput screening and gene signature analyses frequently identify lead therapeutic compounds with unknown modes of action (MoAs), and the resulting uncertainties can lead to the failure of clinical trials. We developed an approach for uncovering MoAs through an interpretable machine learning model of transcriptomics, epigenomics, metabolomics, and proteomics. Examining compounds with beneficial effects in models of Huntington's Disease, we found common MoAs for compounds with unrelated structures, connectivity scores, and binding targets. The approach also predicted highly divergent MoAs for two FDA-approved antihistamines. We experimentally validated these effects, demonstrating that one antihistamine activates autophagy, while the other targets bioenergetics. The use of multiple omics was essential, as some MoAs were virtually undetectable in specific assays. Our approach does not require reference compounds or large databases of experimental data in related systems and thus can be applied to the study of agents with uncharacterized MoAs and to rare or understudied diseases.

Indexed as

Machine LearningAdenosine TriphosphateAnimalsAutophagyCell LineCell SurvivalComputational BiologyGene Regulatory NetworksGenomicsHumansHuntington DiseaseMetabolomicsMiceProteomicsAdenosine Triphosphate

Identifiers

PMID31969612
PMCPMC6976599
OpenAlexW3001400847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.