Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31969540›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of veterinary medical science2020

Susceptibility of chicken Lactobacillus bacteria to coccidiostats.

Marta Dec, Andrzej Puchalski, Dagmara Stępień-Pyśniak, Agnieszka Marek, Renata Urban-Chmiel

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of veterinary medical science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Veterinarni medicina · 2023
    Article
  4. Protective Effects of NovelMicroorganisms · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Microorganisms · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marta DecDepartment of Veterinary Prevention and Avian Diseases, Institute of Biological Bases of Animal Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Akademicka 12, 20-033 Lublin, Poland.
Andrzej PuchalskiDepartment of Veterinary Prevention and Avian Diseases, Institute of Biological Bases of Animal Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Akademicka 12, 20-033 Lublin, Poland.
Dagmara Stępień-PyśniakDepartment of Veterinary Prevention and Avian Diseases, Institute of Biological Bases of Animal Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Akademicka 12, 20-033 Lublin, Poland.
Agnieszka MarekDepartment of Veterinary Prevention and Avian Diseases, Institute of Biological Bases of Animal Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Akademicka 12, 20-033 Lublin, Poland.
Renata Urban-ChmielDepartment of Veterinary Prevention and Avian Diseases, Institute of Biological Bases of Animal Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Akademicka 12, 20-033 Lublin, Poland.
University of Life Sciences in Lublin · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the susceptibility of Lactobacillus bacteria to selected coccidiostats. Seventy-five Lactobacillus isolates obtained from chickens were classified by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry and 16S rDNA restriction analysis into seven species, among which L. salivarius (33%) and L. johnsonii (24%) were dominant. Susceptibility of lactobacilli to coccidiostats was determined by broth microdilution method. The ranges of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were 0.5-≥128 µg/ml for monensin, 0.125-8 µg/ml for salinomycin, ≤0.03-2 µg/ml for lasalocid A, and 4-16 µg/ml for robenidine. Coccidiostats in low concentrations inhibited in vitro growth of most lactobacilli and therefore there is a high probability that administration of this drugs to chickens would reduce the number of lactobacilli in the gut.

Indexed as

AnimalsChickensCoccidiostatsDNA, BacterialFecesLactobacillusMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPolandRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSpectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-IonizationCoccidiostatsDNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16Santibacterial activitychickencoccidiostatsionophoresLactobacillus

Identifiers

PMID31969540
PMCPMC7118476
OpenAlexW3003083733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.