Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31969525›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine2020

A Novel Deep Learning Approach with a 3D Convolutional Ladder Network for Differential Diagnosis of Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus and Alzheimer's Disease.

Ryusuke Irie, Yujiro Otsuka, Akifumi Hagiwara, Koji Kamagata, Kouhei Kamiya, Michimasa Suzuki, Akihiko Wada, Tomoko Maekawa, Shohei Fujita, Shimpei Kato and 5 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Ryusuke IrieDepartment of Radiology, Juntendo University School of Medicine.
Yujiro OtsukaDepartment of Radiology, Juntendo University School of Medicine.
Akifumi HagiwaraDepartment of Radiology, Juntendo University School of Medicine.
Koji KamagataDepartment of Radiology, Juntendo University School of Medicine.
Kouhei KamiyaDepartment of Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo.
Michimasa SuzukiDepartment of Radiology, Juntendo University School of Medicine.
Akihiko WadaDepartment of Radiology, Juntendo University School of Medicine.
Tomoko MaekawaDepartment of Radiology, Juntendo University School of Medicine.
Shohei FujitaDepartment of Radiology, Juntendo University School of Medicine.
Shimpei KatoDepartment of Radiology, Juntendo University School of Medicine.
Madoka NakajimaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Juntendo University School of Medicine.
Masakazu MiyajimaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Juntendo Tokyo Koto Geriatric Medical Center.
Yumiko MotoiDepartment of Neurology, Juntendo University School of Medicine.
Osamu AbeDepartment of Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo.
Shigeki AokiDepartment of Radiology, Juntendo University School of Medicine.
Juntendo University · JPThe University of Tokyo · JPMilliman (United States) · USTokyo Metropolitan Geriatric Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIdiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) are geriatric diseases and common causes of dementia. Recently, many studies on the segmentation, disease detection, or classification of MRI using deep learning have been conducted. The aim of this study was to differentiate iNPH and AD using a residual extraction approach in the deep learning method.

methodsTwenty-three patients with iNPH, 23 patients with AD and 23 healthy controls were included in this study. All patients and volunteers underwent brain MRI with a 3T unit, and we used only whole-brain three-dimensional (3D) T

resultsTwenty-one out of 23 iNPH cases, 19 out of 23 AD cases and 22 out of 23 controls were correctly diagnosed. The accuracy was 0.90. In the Grad-CAM heat map, brain parenchyma surrounding the lateral ventricle was highlighted in about half of the iNPH cases that were successfully diagnosed. The medial temporal lobe or inferior horn of the lateral ventricle was highlighted in many successfully diagnosed cases of AD. About half of the successful cases showed nonspecific heat maps.

conclusionResidual extraction approach in a deep learning method achieved a high accuracy for the differential diagnosis of iNPH, AD, and healthy controls trained with a small number of cases.

Indexed as

Deep LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeuroimagingAgedAged, 80 and overAlzheimer DiseaseArtificial IntelligenceBrainCase-Control StudiesDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedDiagnosis, DifferentialDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansHydrocephalus, Normal PressureImage Processing, Computer-AssistedAlzheimer’s diseaseartificial intelligencecomputer-aided diagnosisdeep learningidiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus

Identifiers

PMID31969525
PMCPMC7809147
OpenAlexW3000889926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.