Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31969318›Full record

Observational studyBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2020

Risk of herpes zoster after exposure to varicella to explore the exogenous boosting hypothesis: self controlled case series study using UK electronic healthcare data.

Harriet Forbes, Ian Douglas, Adam Finn, Judith Breuer, Krishnan Bhaskaran, Liam Smeeth, Simon Packer, Sinéad M Langan, Kathryn E Mansfield, Robin Marlow and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Harriet ForbesFaculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E7HT, UK harriet.forbes@lshtm.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-6888-2212
Ian DouglasFaculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E7HT, UK.
Adam FinnBristol Children's Vaccine Centre, Schools of Population Health Sciences and of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Judith BreuerUCL Division of Infection and Immunity Wing 1.3, London, UK.
Krishnan BhaskaranFaculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E7HT, UK.
Liam SmeethFaculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E7HT, UK.
Simon PackerField Epidemiology Services, Public Health England Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Sinéad M LanganFaculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E7HT, UK.
Kathryn E MansfieldFaculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E7HT, UK.
Robin MarlowBristol Children's Vaccine Centre, Schools of Population Health Sciences and of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Heather WhitakerStatistics, Modelling and Economics Department, Data and Analytical Sciences, National Infection Service, Public Health England Colindale, London, UK.
Charlotte Warren-GashFaculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E7HT, UK.
University of London · GBPublic Health England · GBUniversity of Bristol · GBCentre for Immunity, Infection and Evolution · GB

Funding

British Heart FoundationDepartment of Health NIHR/CS/010/014Medical Research Council MR/S003940/1Wellcome Trust 201440/Z/16/ZWellcome Trust 205039/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the magnitude and duration of any hypothesised protective effect of household exposure to a child with varicella on the relative incidence of herpes zoster in adults.

designSelf controlled case series.

settingUK general practices contributing to Clinical Practice Research Datalink.

participants9604 adults (≥18 years) with a diagnosis of herpes zoster (in primary care or hospital records) between 1997 and 2018, who during their observation period lived with a child (<18 years) with a diagnosis of varicella.

main outcome measuresRelative incidence of herpes zoster in the 20 years after exposure to a child with varicella in the household compared with baseline time (all other time, excluding the 60 days before exposure).

results6584 of the 9604 adults with herpes zoster (68.6%) were women. Median age of exposure to a child with varicella was 38.3 years (interquartile range 32.3-48.8 years) and median observation period was 14.7 (11.1-17.7) years. 4116 adults developed zoster in the baseline period, 433 in the 60 days before exposure and 5055 in the risk period. After adjustment for age, calendar time, and season, strong evidence suggested that in the two years after household exposure to a child with varicella, adults were 33% less likely to develop zoster (incidence ratio 0.67, 95% confidence interval 0.62 to 0.73) compared with baseline time. In the 10-20 years after exposure, adults were 27% less likely to develop herpes zoster (0.73, 0.62 to 0.87) compared with baseline time. A stronger boosting effect was observed among men than among women after exposure to varicella.

conclusionsThe relative incidence of zoster was lower in the periods after exposure to a household contact with varicella, with modest but long lasting protective effects observed. This study suggests that exogenous boosting provides some protection from the risk of herpes zoster, but not complete immunity, as assumed by previous cost effectiveness estimates of varicella immunisation.

Indexed as

AdultCase-Control StudiesChickenpoxChild, PreschoolElectronic Health RecordsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHerpesvirus 3, HumanHerpes ZosterHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedRisk AssessmentUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID31969318
PMCPMC7190015
OpenAlexW3002987632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.