Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31969172›Full record

Observational studyArthritis research & therapy2020

Abatacept in rheumatoid arthritis: survival on drug, clinical outcomes, and their predictors-data from a large national quality register.

Giovanni Cagnotto, Minna Willim, Jan-Åke Nilsson, Michele Compagno, Lennart T H Jacobsson, Saedis Saevarsdottir, Carl Turesson

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Arthritis research & therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Influence of theJournal of personalized medicine · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Impact of Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms ofJournal of personalized medicine · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Giovanni CagnottoRheumatology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden. giovanni.cagnotto@med.lu.se.ORCID 0000-0002-1682-8158
Minna WillimRheumatology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Jan-Åke NilssonRheumatology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Michele CompagnoDepartment of Rheumatology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Lennart T H JacobssonDepartment of Rheumatology & Inflammation Research, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Saedis SaevarsdottirUnit of Translational Epidemiology, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Carl TuressonRheumatology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Lund University · SEKarolinska Institutet · SEUniversity of Gothenburg · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are limited data regarding efficacy of abatacept treatment for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) outside clinical trials. Quality registers have been useful for observational studies on tumor necrosis factor inhibition in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to investigate clinical efficacy and tolerability of abatacept in RA, using a national register.

methodsRA patients that started abatacept between 2006 and 2017 and were included in the Swedish Rheumatology Quality register (N = 2716) were investigated. Survival on drug was estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. The European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) good response and Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) response (improvement of ≥ 0.3) rates (LUNDEX corrected for drug survival) at 6 and at 12 months were assessed. Predictors of discontinuation were investigated by Cox regression analyses, and predictors of clinical response by logistic regression. Significance-based backward stepwise selection of variables was used for the final multivariate models.

resultsThere was a significant difference in drug survival by previous biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD) exposure (p < 0.001), with longer survival in bionaïve patients. Men (hazard ratio (HR) 0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.74-0.98) and methotrexate users (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.76-0.95) were less likely to discontinue abatacept, whereas a high pain score predicted discontinuation (HR 1.14 per standard deviation, 95% CI 1.07-1.20). The absence of previous bDMARD exposure, male sex, and a low HAQ score were independently associated with LUNDEX-corrected EULAR good response. The absence of previous bDMARD exposure also predicted LUNDEX-corrected HAQ response.

conclusionsIn this population-based study of RA, bDMARD naïve patients and male patients were more likely to remain on abatacept with a major clinical response.

Indexed as

AbataceptAdultAgedAntirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRegistriesSwedenTreatment OutcomeAbataceptAntirheumatic AgentsAbataceptResponse predictorsRheumatoid arthritisSurvival on drugTreatment outcome

Identifiers

PMID31969172
PMCPMC6977240
OpenAlexW3006885261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.