Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31969162›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2020

The prevalence of Dichelobacter nodosus in clinically footrot-free sheep flocks: a comparative field study on elimination strategies.

A F Kraft, H Strobel, J Hilke, A Steiner, P Kuhnert

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Characterisation ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
  6. Prevalence ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
  7. Impact of Strain Variation ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A F KraftDepartment of Clinical Veterinary Medicine, Clinic for Ruminants, Vetsuisse-Faculty, University of Bern, Bremgartenstrasse 109a, CH-3001, Bern, Switzerland. alinta.kraft@vetsuisse.unibe.ch.
H StrobelSchafpraxis, Am Hopfenberg 8, 89352, Stoffenried, Germany.
J HilkeSchafpraxis, Am Hopfenberg 8, 89352, Stoffenried, Germany.
A SteinerDepartment of Clinical Veterinary Medicine, Clinic for Ruminants, Vetsuisse-Faculty, University of Bern, Bremgartenstrasse 109a, CH-3001, Bern, Switzerland.
P KuhnertInstitute of Veterinary Bacteriology, Vetsuisse-Faculty, University of Bern, Länggassstrasse 122, CH-3001, Bern, Switzerland.
University of Bern · CH

Funding

Bundesamt für Lebensmittelsicherheit und Veterinärwesen 1.18.13Clinic for Ruminants, Department of Clinical Veterinary Medicine, Vetsuisse-Faculty, University of Bern, Switzerland 44-092Institute of Veterinary Bacteriology, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Switzerland 31-836
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOvine footrot caused by Dichelobacter nodosus (D nodosus) is an infectious disease affecting sheep worldwide. Switzerland plans a nationwide footrot eradication program, based on PCR-testing of interdigital swab samples. The aim of this study was to test for the presence of D nodosus in clinically footrot-free sheep flocks which had been subjected to different treatment strategies, to assess whether they were feasible for the eradication process, especially focussing on antimicrobial flock treatments. Clinical scoring and PCR-results were compared. Ten farms had used hoof bathing and hoof trimming without causing bleeding, ten had used individual treatments and flock vaccines to gain the free status and ten had become free through whole-flock systemic macrolide treatment. For every farm, three risk-based collected pool samples were analysed for the occurrence of virulent and benign D nodosus by PCR detection of aprV2/aprB2.

resultsSix flocks from any treatment group tested positive for aprB2 in all pools. Clinical signs were absent at the time of sampling, but some flocks had experienced non-progressive interdigital inflammation previously. Two flocks tested aprV2-positive in the high-risk pool. One of them underwent a progressive footrot outbreak shortly after sampling. Individual retesting indicated, that virulent D nodosus most likely was reintroduced by a recently purchased ram. In the second flock, a ram was tested positive and treated before clinical signs occurred.

conclusionsAll treatment strategies eliminated the causative agent and were found to be suitable for implementation in the PCR-based eradication process. PCR-testing proved to be more sensitive than visual scoring, as it also detected clinically healthy carriers. It will be of benefit as a diagnostic tool in elimination and surveillance programs.

Indexed as

Animal HusbandryAnimalsDichelobacter nodosusDisinfectantsFemaleFoot RotGram-Negative Bacterial InfectionsHoof and ClawMacrolidesMalePrevalenceReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionSheepSheep DiseasesSwitzerlandVaccinationDisinfectantsMacrolidesaprB2aprV2Dichelobacter nodosusElimination programFootFootrotLamenessSheep

Identifiers

PMID31969162
PMCPMC6977287
OpenAlexW3006843962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.