Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31969145›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2020

Educating health professionals to optimise falls screening in hospitals: protocol for a mixed methods study.

L Shaw, D Kiegaldie, M E Morris

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

L ShawFaculty of Health Science, Youth and Community Studies, Holmesglen Institute, 488 South Road, Moorabbin, Vic, 3189, Australia. Louise.shaw@holmesglen.edu.au.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8188-2313
D KiegaldieFaculty of Health Science, Youth and Community Studies, Holmesglen Institute, 488 South Road, Moorabbin, Vic, 3189, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4077-5818
M E MorrisSchool of Allied Health, La Trobe Centre for Sport and Exercises Medicine Research, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, 3086, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0114-4175
Holmes Community College · USLa Trobe University · AUMoorabbin Hospital · AU

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council GNT1152853
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFalls in hospitals remain a major challenge to patient safety. All hospitalised adults are at risk of falling during their inpatient stay, though this risk is not always realised by patients and clinicians. This study will evaluate the outcomes of a hospital clinician education program that teaches clinicians how to screen for falls risk and assign mitigation strategies using clinical reasoning, rather than relying on a standardised falls risk assessment tool (FRAT). The education program aims to increase clinician knowledge, motivation and confidence in screening falls risk and selecting individual falls prevention interventions. Perceptions of the education intervention will also be examined.

methodsParticipants will be a sample of convenience of nurses and allied health professionals from five Australian hospitals. For each hospital there will be two cohorts. Cohort 1 will be clinical leaders who shall receive a three-hour education program on the latest evidence in hospital falls risk assessment and how to implement a new falls screening and management tool. They will also be taught practical skills to enable them to deliver an effective one-hour in-service training session to Cohort 2. Cohort 2 will be recruited from the workforce as a whole and include nurses and other health professionals involved in routine hospital falls screening and prevention. The investigation will be framed on Keller's Model of Motivational Design and Kirkpatrick's evaluation framework. It will involve a mixed methods pre and post-test questionnaire design inclusive of semi-structured telephone interviews, to triangulate the data from multiple approaches. DISCUSSION: This study will quantify the outcomes of a high-quality clinician education program to increase knowledge of evidence-based practice for falls prevention. It is predicted that positive behavioural changes will occur in health professionals, leading to organisational change and improved patient outcomes. Furthermore, the findings from the study will inform the future refinement of educational delivery to health professionals across hospital sites.

trial registrationThe study has also been approved by the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: Preventing Hospital Falls: Optimal Screening UTN U1111-1225-8450. Universal Trial Number (UTN): U1111-1228-0041 (obtained 5/2/19). Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR): ACTRN12619000200189 (obtained 12/2/19).

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeMass ScreeningAccidental FallsAustraliaCohort StudiesEvidence-Based PracticeHospitalsHumansPersonnel, HospitalProgram EvaluationQualitative ResearchRisk AssessmentSurveys and QuestionnairesEducationEvidence-basedFallsFalls preventionHealth professionalsHospitalNursingPhysiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID31969145
PMCPMC6977326
OpenAlexW3004530373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.