Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31968949›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of chemical physics2020

Automatic error control during forward flux sampling of rare events in master equation models.

Max C Klein, Elijah Roberts

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of chemical physics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Max C KleinDepartment of Biophysics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, USA.
Elijah RobertsDepartment of Biophysics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, USA.ORCID 0000000256198066

Funding

PROGRAM IN MOLECULAR BIOPHYSICST32GM008403 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BARRICK, DOUGLAS E. · 1990 to 2019
$13.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008403
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enhanced sampling methods, such as forward flux sampling (FFS), have great capacity for accelerating stochastic simulations of nonequilibrium biochemical systems involving rare events. However, the description of the tradeoffs between simulation efficiency and error in FFS remains incomplete. We present a novel and mathematically rigorous analysis of the errors in FFS that, for the first time, covers the contribution of every phase of the simulation. We derive a closed form expression for the optimally efficient count of samples to take in each FFS phase in terms of a fixed constraint on sampling error. We introduce a new method, forward flux pilot sampling (FFPilot), that is designed to take full advantage of our optimizing equation without prior information or assumptions about the phase weights and costs along the transition path. In simulations of both single and multidimensional gene regulatory networks, FFPilot is able to completely control sampling error. We then discuss how memory effects can introduce additional error when relaxation along the transition path is slow. This extra error can be traced to correlations between the FFS phases and can be controlled by monitoring the covariance between them. Finally, we show that, in sets of simulations with matched error, FFPilot is on the order of tens-to-hundreds of times faster than direct sampling and noticeably more efficient than previous FFS methods.

Identifiers

PMID31968949
PMCPMC7043844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.