Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31968702›Full record

ArticleViruses2020

Characterization of the Immune Response of MERS-CoV Vaccine Candidates Derived from Two Different Vectors in Mice.

Entao Li, Feihu Yan, Pei Huang, Hang Chi, Shengnan Xu, Guohua Li, Chuanyu Liu, Na Feng, Hualei Wang, Yongkun Zhao and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Viruses, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review on Approved and Inprogress COVID-19 Vaccines.Iranian journal of pharmaceutical research : IJPR · 2022
    Review
  5. Advances in mRNA and other vaccines against MERS-CoV.Translational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Coronavirus Disease 2019-COVID-19.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2020
    Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Entao LiCollege of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.
Feihu YanKey Laboratory of Jilin Province for Zoonosis Prevention and Control, Changchun Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changchun 130122, China.
Pei HuangKey Laboratory of Jilin Province for Zoonosis Prevention and Control, Changchun Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changchun 130122, China.
Hang ChiKey Laboratory of Jilin Province for Zoonosis Prevention and Control, Changchun Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changchun 130122, China.
Shengnan XuKey Laboratory of Jilin Province for Zoonosis Prevention and Control, Changchun Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changchun 130122, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1800-0741
Guohua LiKey Laboratory of Jilin Province for Zoonosis Prevention and Control, Changchun Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changchun 130122, China.
Chuanyu LiuKey Laboratory of Jilin Province for Zoonosis Prevention and Control, Changchun Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changchun 130122, China.
Na FengKey Laboratory of Jilin Province for Zoonosis Prevention and Control, Changchun Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changchun 130122, China.
Hualei WangCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Jilin University, Changchun 130062, China.
Yongkun ZhaoKey Laboratory of Jilin Province for Zoonosis Prevention and Control, Changchun Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changchun 130122, China.
Songtao YangKey Laboratory of Jilin Province for Zoonosis Prevention and Control, Changchun Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changchun 130122, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7557-6982
Xianzhu XiaCollege of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.
Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNSouth China Agricultural University · CNJilin University · CNShihezi University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 31902306the National Project for Prevention and Control of Transboundary Animal Diseases 2017YFD0501804
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) is an acute, high-mortality-rate, severe infectious disease caused by an emerging MERS coronavirus (MERS-CoV) that causes severe respiratory diseases. The continuous spread and great pandemic potential of MERS-CoV make it necessarily important to develop effective vaccines. We previously demonstrated that the application of Gram-positive enhancer matrix (GEM) particles as a bacterial vector displaying the MERS-CoV receptor-binding domain (RBD) is a very promising MERS vaccine candidate that is capable of producing potential neutralization antibodies. We have also used the rabies virus (RV) as a viral vector to design a recombinant vaccine by expressing the MERS-CoV S1 (spike) protein on the surface of the RV. In this study, we compared the immunological efficacy of the vaccine candidates in BALB/c mice in terms of the levels of humoral and cellular immune responses. The results show that the rabies virus vector-based vaccine can induce remarkably earlier antibody response and higher levels of cellular immunity than the GEM particles vector. However, the GEM particles vector-based vaccine candidate can induce remarkably higher antibody response, even at a very low dose of 1 µg. These results indicate that vaccines constructed using different vaccine vector platforms for the same pathogen have different rates and trends in humoral and cellular immune responses in the same animal model. This discovery not only provides more alternative vaccine development platforms for MERS-CoV vaccine development, but also provides a theoretical basis for our future selection of vaccine vector platforms for other specific pathogens.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralCell LineCoronavirus InfectionsGenetic VectorsHumansImmunizationImmunoglobulin GLactococcus lactisMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMiddle East Respiratory Syndrome CoronavirusRabies virusSpike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusT-LymphocytesAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralImmunoglobulin GSpike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusVaccines, SyntheticViral Vaccinesbacterium-like particleimmune responseMERS-CoVrecombinant rabies virus

Identifiers

PMID31968702
PMCPMC7019946
OpenAlexW2999176115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.