Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31968651›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2020

Genetic and Epigenetic Biomarkers of Immune Checkpoint Blockade Response.

Qingyang Xiao, André Nobre, Pilar Piñeiro, Miguel-Ángel Berciano-Guerrero, Emilio Alba, Manuel Cobo, Volker M Lauschke, Isabel Barragán

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. PD-1Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Qingyang XiaoGroup of Pharmacoepigenetics, Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden.
André NobreGroup of Pharmacoepigenetics, Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden.
Pilar PiñeiroSection of Immuno-Oncology, Medical Oncology Service, University Hospitals Regional and Virgen de la Victoria, Biomedical Research Institute of Malaga (IBIMA), 29010 Málaga, Spain.
Miguel-Ángel Berciano-GuerreroSection of Immuno-Oncology, Medical Oncology Service, University Hospitals Regional and Virgen de la Victoria, Biomedical Research Institute of Malaga (IBIMA), 29010 Málaga, Spain.
Emilio AlbaSection of Immuno-Oncology, Medical Oncology Service, University Hospitals Regional and Virgen de la Victoria, Biomedical Research Institute of Malaga (IBIMA), 29010 Málaga, Spain.
Manuel CoboSection of Immuno-Oncology, Medical Oncology Service, University Hospitals Regional and Virgen de la Victoria, Biomedical Research Institute of Malaga (IBIMA), 29010 Málaga, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3402-1144
Volker M LauschkeGroup of Personalized Medicine and Drug Development, Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-1140-6204
Isabel BarragánGroup of Pharmacoepigenetics, Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden.
Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga · ESKarolinska Institutet · SE

Funding

China Scholarship Council 201600160066Consejería de Salud, Junta de Andalucía SA0263/2017Fundación Bancaria Unicaja NEOTCELLH2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions 799818Instituto de Salud Carlos III PI18/01592Karolinska Institutet FUS 2017Svenska Läkaresällskapet SLS-693561Svenska Läkaresällskapet SLS-694791
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Checkpoint inhibitor therapy constitutes a promising cancer treatment strategy that targets the immune checkpoints to re-activate silenced T cell cytotoxicity. In recent pivotal trials, immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) demonstrated durable responses and acceptable toxicity, resulting in the regulatory approval of 8 checkpoint inhibitors to date for 15 cancer indications. However, up to ~85% of patients present with innate or acquired resistance to ICB, limiting its clinical utility. Current response biomarker candidates, including DNA mutation and neoantigen load, immune profiles, as well as programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, are only weak predictors of ICB response. Thus, identification of novel, more predictive biomarkers that could identify patients who would benefit from ICB constitutes one of the most important areas of immunotherapy research. Aberrant DNA methylation (5mC) and hydroxymethylation (5hmC) were discovered in multiple cancers, and dynamic changes of the epigenomic landscape have been identified during T cell differentiation and activation. While their role in cancer immunosuppression remains to be elucidated, recent evidence suggests that 5mC and 5hmC may serve as prognostic and predictive biomarkers of ICB-sensitive cancers. In this review, we describe the role of epigenetic phenomena in tumor immunoediting and other immune evasion related processes, provide a comprehensive update of the current status of ICB-response biomarkers, and highlight promising epigenomic biomarker candidates.

Indexed as

epigeneticsimmunotherapymelanomanon-small-cell lung cancerpredictorresistancestroma

Identifiers

PMID31968651
PMCPMC7019273
OpenAlexW3000368467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.