Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31968579›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Assessment of the Risk of Oral Cancer Incidence in A High-Risk Population and Establishment of A Predictive Model for Oral Cancer Incidence Using A Population-Based Cohort in Taiwan.

Li-Chen Hung, Pei-Tseng Kung, Chi-Hsuan Lung, Ming-Hsui Tsai, Shih-An Liu, Li-Ting Chiu, Kuang-Hua Huang, Wen-Chen Tsai

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Evaluation of Nationwide Oral Mucosal Screening Program for Oral Cancer Mortality among Men in Taiwan.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Li-Chen HungDepartment of Public Health, China Medical University, Taichung 40402, Taiwan.
Pei-Tseng KungDepartment of Healthcare Administration, Asia University, Taichung 41354, Taiwan.
Chi-Hsuan LungDepartment of Social Work, National Quemoy University, Quemoy 892, Taiwan.
Ming-Hsui TsaiDepartment of Otolaryngology, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung 40447, Taiwan.
Shih-An LiuDepartment of ENT, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung 40705, Taiwan.
Li-Ting ChiuDepartment of Health Services Administration, China Medical University, Taichung 40402, Taiwan.
Kuang-Hua HuangDepartment of Health Services Administration, China Medical University, Taichung 40402, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-4351-6202
Wen-Chen TsaiDepartment of Health Services Administration, China Medical University, Taichung 40402, Taiwan.
China Medical University · TWAsia University · TWNational Quemoy University · TWTaichung Veterans General Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We aimed to assess the risk of oral cancer incidence in a high-risk population, establish a predictive model for oral cancer among these high-risk individuals, and assess the predictive ability of the constructed model. Individuals aged ≥30 years who had a habit of smoking or betel nut chewing and had undergone oral cancer screening in 2010 or 2011 were selected as study subjects. The incidence of oral cancer among the subjects at the end of 2014 was determined. The annual oral cancer incidence among individuals with a positive screening result was 624 per 100,000 persons, which was 6.5 times that of the annual oral cancer incidence among all individuals screened. Male sex, aged 45-64 years, divorce, low educational level, presence of diabetes, presence of other cancers, high comorbidity severity, a habit of smoking or betel nut chewing, and low monthly salary were high-risk factors for oral cancer incidence (

Indexed as

ArecaAdultAgedFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMasticationMiddle AgedModels, TheoreticalMouth NeoplasmsRisk FactorsSmokingTaiwanbetel nut chewingoral cancerpredictionscreeningsmoking

Identifiers

PMID31968579
PMCPMC7014279
OpenAlexW3000306621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.