Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31968564›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2020

Genetics of Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Candidate Gene Studies.

Daniel H Pope, Benjamin M Davies, Oliver D Mowforth, A Ramsay Bowden, Mark R N Kotter

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Answer to the letter to the editor of H. Ren, et al. concerning "CALM1 polymorphism in degenerative cervical myelopathy of the Indian cohort" by Maheshwari S, et al. (Eur spine J [2025]; doi: 10.1007/s00586-025-09090-7).European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Article
  3. Letter to the editor concerning "CALM1 polymorphism in degenerative cervical myelopathy of the Indian cohort" by S. Maheshwari, et al. (Eur spine J [2025]; doi: 10.1007/s00586-025-09090-7).European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Article
  4. CALM1 polymorphism in degenerative cervical myelopathy of the Indian cohort.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel H PopeSchool of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0SP, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3210-8214
Benjamin M DaviesDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0591-5069
Oliver D MowforthSchool of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0SP, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6788-745X
A Ramsay BowdenDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1138-4452
Mark R N KotterDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5145-7199
University of Cambridge · GBWellcome/MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute · GB

Funding

National Institute for Health Research CS-2015-15-023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is estimated to be the most common cause of adult spinal cord impairment. Evidence that is suggestive of a genetic basis to DCM has been increasing over the last decade. A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, and HuGENet databases from their origin up to 14th December 2019 to evaluate the role of single genes in DCM in its onset, clinical phenotype, and response to surgical intervention. The initial search yielded 914 articles, with 39 articles being identified as eligible after screening. We distinguish between those contributing to spinal column deterioration and those contributing to spinal cord deterioration in assessing the evidence of genetic contributions to DCM. Evidence regarding a total of 28 candidate genes was identified. Of these, 22 were found to have an effect on the radiological onset of spinal column disease, while 12 genes had an effect on clinical onset of spinal cord disease. Polymorphisms of eight genes were found to have an effect on the radiological severity of DCM, while three genes had an effect on clinical severity. Polymorphisms of six genes were found to have an effect on clinical response to surgery in spinal cord disease. There are clear genetic effects on the development of spinal pathology, the central nervous system (CNS) response to bony pathology, the severity of both bony and cord pathology, and the subsequent response to surgical intervention. Work to disentangle the mechanisms by which the genes that are reviewed here exert their effects, as well as improved quality of evidence across diverse populations is required for further investigating the genetic contribution to DCM.

Indexed as

degenerative cervical myelopathygeneticsossification posterior longitudinal ligamentseveritysingle nucleotide polymorphismsurgery

Identifiers

PMID31968564
PMCPMC7019856
OpenAlexW2999840998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.