Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31968320›Full record

ArticleJournal of neural engineering2020

A practical guide to methodological considerations in the controllability of structural brain networks.

Teresa M Karrer, Jason Z Kim, Jennifer Stiso, Ari E Kahn, Fabio Pasqualetti, Ute Habel, Danielle S Bassett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neural engineering, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Mindful attention promotes control of brain network dynamics for self-regulation and discontinues the past from the present.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Trial
  2. Language Recovery after Brain Injury: A Structural Network Control Theory Study.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Low-dimensional controllability of brain networks.PLoS computational biology · 2025
    Article

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Teresa M KarrerFaculty of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, RWTH Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7444-7679
Jason Z KimDepartment of Bioengineering, School of Engineering & Applied Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States of America.
Jennifer StisoDepartment of Neuroscience, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3295-586X
Ari E KahnDepartment of Neuroscience, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States of America.
Fabio PasqualettiDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8457-8656
Ute HabelFaculty of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, RWTH Aachen, Germany.
Danielle S BassettDepartment of Bioengineering, School of Engineering & Applied Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6183-4493

Funding

Longitudinal Mapping of Network Development Underlying Executive Dysfunction in AdolescenceR01MH113550 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Danielle Smith Bassett, Theodore Satterthwaite · 2018 to 2026
$6.9M
Inter-modal Coupling Image AnalyticsR01MH112847 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Theodore Satterthwaite, Russell Takeshi Shinohara · 2017 to 2026
$5.9M
Linguistic and NonLinguistic Functions of Frontal CortexR01DC009209 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI THOMPSONSCHILL, SHARON L · 2008 to 2018
$5.2M
Network Control and Functional Context: Mechanisms for TMS ResponseRF1MH116920 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BASSETT, DANIELLE SMITH, OATHES, DESMOND · 2018 to 2018
$2.8M
Virtual Resection to Treat EpilepsyR01NS099348 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BASSETT, DANIELLE SMITH, LITT, BRIAN · 2016 to 2019
$2.3M
Multimodal brain maturation indices modulating psychopathology and neurocognitionR01MH107235 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GUR, RUBEN C. · 2015 to 2017
$1.5M
Evolution of the Linked Architecture of Network Control and Executive Function in AdolescenceR21MH106799 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BASSETT, DANIELLE SMITH, SATTERTHWAITE, THEODORE · 2016 to 2017
$515k
CRCNS: US-France Modeling & Predicting BCI Learning from Dynamic NetworksR01HD086888 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BASSETT, DANIELLE SMITH · 2015 to 2018
$506k
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD086888NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC009209NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH107235NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH112847NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH113550NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH106799NIMH NIH HHS RF1 MH116920NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS099348
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePredicting how the brain can be driven to specific states by means of internal or external control requires a fundamental understanding of the relationship between neural connectivity and activity. Network control theory is a powerful tool from the physical and engineering sciences that can provide insights regarding that relationship; it formalizes the study of how the dynamics of a complex system can arise from its underlying structure of interconnected units. APPROACH: Given the recent use of network control theory in neuroscience, it is now timely to offer a practical guide to methodological considerations in the controllability of structural brain networks. Here we provide a systematic overview of the framework, examine the impact of modeling choices on frequently studied control metrics, and suggest potentially useful theoretical extensions. We ground our discussions, numerical demonstrations, and theoretical advances in a dataset of high-resolution diffusion imaging with 730 diffusion directions acquired over approximately 1 h of scanning from ten healthy young adults. MAIN

resultsFollowing a didactic introduction of the theory, we probe how a selection of modeling choices affects four common statistics: average controllability, modal controllability, minimum control energy, and optimal control energy. Next, we extend the current state-of-the-art in two ways: first, by developing an alternative measure of structural connectivity that accounts for radial propagation of activity through abutting tissue, and second, by defining a complementary metric quantifying the complexity of the energy landscape of a system. We close with specific modeling recommendations and a discussion of methodological constraints. SIGNIFICANCE: Our hope is that this accessible account will inspire the neuroimaging community to more fully exploit the potential of network control theory in tackling pressing questions in cognitive, developmental, and clinical neuroscience.

Indexed as

BrainHumansYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31968320
PMCPMC7734595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.