Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31968065›Full record

ArticleJAMA cardiology2020

Association of High-Density Calcified 1K Plaque With Risk of Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Alexander R van Rosendael, Jagat Narula, Fay Y Lin, Inge J van den Hoogen, Umberto Gianni, Omar Al Hussein Alawamlh, Patricia C Dunham, Jessica M Peña, Sang-Eun Lee, Daniele Andreini and 39 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA cardiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 83 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
83citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

83 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 153 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Coronary artery disease imaging with total-body PET.The British journal of radiology · 2026
    Review
  9. CAPIRE score predicts long-term major cardiac events.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

49 authors at 20 institutions in 9 countries.

Alexander R van RosendaelDalio Institute of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Jagat NarulaIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Mount Sinai Heart, Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, and Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Cardiovascular Health, New York, New York.
Fay Y LinDalio Institute of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Inge J van den HoogenDalio Institute of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Umberto GianniDalio Institute of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Omar Al Hussein AlawamlhDalio Institute of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Patricia C DunhamDalio Institute of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Jessica M PeñaDalio Institute of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Sang-Eun LeeDivision of Cardiology, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Integrative Cardiovascular Imaging Research Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Daniele AndreiniDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Centro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS (Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico), Milan, Italy.
Filippo CademartiriCardiovascular Imaging Center, SDN IRCCS (Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico), Naples, Italy.
Kavitha ChinnaiyanDepartment of Cardiology, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan.
Benjamin J W ChowDepartment of Medicine and Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Edoardo ConteDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Centro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS (Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico), Milan, Italy.
Ricardo C CuryDepartment of Radiology, Miami Cardiac and Vascular Institute, Miami, Florida.
Gudrun FeuchtnerDepartment of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Martin HadamitzkyDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, German Heart Center Munich, Munich, Germany.
Yong-Jin KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Jonathon LeipsicDepartment of Medicine and Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Erica MaffeiDepartment of Radiology, Area Vasta 1/ASUR Marche, Urbino, Italy.
Hugo MarquesUNICA, Unit of Cardiovascular Imaging, Hospital da Luz, Lisboa, Portugal.
Pedro de Araújo GonçalvesUNICA, Unit of Cardiovascular Imaging, Hospital da Luz, Lisboa, Portugal.
Fabian PlankDepartment of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Gianluca PontoneDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Centro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS (Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico), Milan, Italy.
Gilbert L RaffDepartment of Cardiology, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan.
Todd C VillinesCardiology Service, Walter Reed National Military Center, Bethesda, Maryland.
Harald G WeirichDepartment of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Subhi J Al'ArefDalio Institute of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Lohendran BaskaranDalio Institute of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Iksung ChoDalio Institute of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Ibrahim DanadDepartment of Cardiology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Donghee HanDivision of Cardiology, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Integrative Cardiovascular Imaging Research Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Ran HeoAsan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Ji Hyun LeeDivision of Cardiology, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Integrative Cardiovascular Imaging Research Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Asim RivziDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Wijnand J StuijfzandDalio Institute of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Heidi GransarDepartment of Imaging, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
Yao LuDepartment of Healthcare Policy and Research, New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.
Ji Min SungDivision of Cardiology, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Integrative Cardiovascular Imaging Research Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Hyung-Bok ParkDivision of Cardiology, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Integrative Cardiovascular Imaging Research Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Habib SamadyDivision of Cardiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Peter H StoneDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Renu VirmaniDepartment of Pathology, CVPath Institute, Gaithersburg, Maryland.
Matthew J BudoffDepartment of Medicine, Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute, Torrance, California.
Daniel S BermanDepartment of Imaging and Medicine, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
Hyuk-Jae ChangDivision of Cardiology, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Integrative Cardiovascular Imaging Research Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Jeroen J BaxDepartment of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
James K MinDalio Institute of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Leslee J ShawDalio Institute of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Yonsei University · KRNewYork–Presbyterian Hospital · USCornell University · USNew York Hospital Queens · USPresbyterian Hospital · USBeaumont Hospital, Royal Oak · USCedars-Sinai Medical Center · USCentro Cardiologico Monzino · ITHospital da Luz · PTIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITUniversität Innsbruck · ATAmsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLBrigham and Women's Hospital · USCVPath Institute · USDeutsches Herzzentrum München · DEEmory University · USGangnam Severance Hospital · KRIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USInnsbruck Medical University · ATLeiden University Medical Center · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Plaque morphologic measures on coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) have been associated with future acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, the evolution of calcified coronary plaques by noninvasive imaging is not known. Objective: To ascertain whether the increasing density in calcified coronary plaque is associated with risk for ACS. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter case-control cohort study included individuals enrolled in ICONIC (Incident Coronary Syndromes Identified by Computed Tomography), a nested case-control study of patients drawn from the CONFIRM (Coronary CT Angiography Evaluation for Clinical Outcomes: An International Multicenter) registry, which included 13 study sites in 8 countries. Patients who experienced core laboratory-verified ACS after baseline CCTA (n = 189) and control individuals who did not experience ACS after baseline CCTA (n = 189) were included. Patients and controls were matched 1:1 by propensity scores for age; male sex; presence of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes; family history of premature coronary artery disease (CAD); current smoking status; and CAD severity. Data were analyzed from November 2018 to March 2019. Exposures: Whole-heart atherosclerotic plaque volume was quantitated from all coronary vessels and their branches. For patients who underwent invasive angiography at the time of ACS, culprit lesions were coregistered to baseline CCTA lesions by a blinded independent reader. Low-density plaque was defined as having less than 130 Hounsfield units (HU); calcified plaque, as having more than 350 HU and subcategorized on a voxel-level basis into 3 strata: 351 to 700 HU, 701 to 1000 HU, and more than 1000 HU (termed 1K plaque). Main Outcomes and Measures: Association between calcium density and future ACS risk. Results: A total of 189 patients and 189 matched controls (mean [SD] age of 59.9 [9.8] years; 247 [65.3%] were male) were included in the analysis and were monitored during a mean (SD) follow-up period of 3.9 (2.5) years. The overall mean (SD) calcified plaque volume (>350 HU) was similar between patients and controls (76.4 [101.6] mm3 vs 99.0 [156.1] mm3; P = .32), but patients who experienced ACS exhibited less 1K plaque (>1000 HU) compared with controls (3.9 [8.3] mm3 vs 9.4 [23.2] mm3; P = .02). Individuals within the highest quartile of 1K plaque exhibited less low-density plaque, as a percentage of total plaque, when compared with patients within the lower 3 quartiles (12.6% [10.4%] vs 24.9% [20.6%]; P < .001). For 93 culprit precursor lesions detected by CCTA, the volume of 1K plaque was lower compared with the maximally stenotic lesion in controls (2.6 [7.2] mm3 vs 7.6 [20.3] mm3; P = .01). The per-patient and per-lesion results were similar between the 2 groups when restricted to myocardial infarction cases. Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this study suggest that, on a per-patient and per-lesion basis, 1K plaque was associated with a lower risk for future ACS and that measurement of 1K plaque may improve risk stratification beyond plaque burden.

Indexed as

Risk AssessmentAcute Coronary SyndromeCase-Control StudiesCohort StudiesComputed Tomography AngiographyCoronary StenosisFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPlaque, AtheroscleroticVascular Calcification

Identifiers

PMID31968065
PMCPMC6990946
OpenAlexW3002167629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.