Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31967990›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2020

Tissue-guided LASSO for prediction of clinical drug response using preclinical samples.

Edward W Huang, Ameya Bhope, Jing Lim, Saurabh Sinha, Amin Emad

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Drug Sensitivity Prediction Based on Multi-stage Multi-modal Drug Representation Learning.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Dissecting the Genome for Drug Response Prediction.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Edward W HuangDepartment of Computer Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Illinois, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4461-8545
Ameya BhopeDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, McGill University, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4558-7020
Jing LimDepartment of Computer Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Illinois, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3650-2267
Saurabh SinhaDepartment of Computer Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Illinois, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6033-7746
Amin EmadDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, McGill University, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5108-4887
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USMcGill University · CA

Funding

TRAININGU54GM114838 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI HAN, JIAWEI, SINHA, SAURABH · 2014 to 2017
$10.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM114838
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prediction of clinical drug response (CDR) of cancer patients, based on their clinical and molecular profiles obtained prior to administration of the drug, can play a significant role in individualized medicine. Machine learning models have the potential to address this issue but training them requires data from a large number of patients treated with each drug, limiting their feasibility. While large databases of drug response and molecular profiles of preclinical in-vitro cancer cell lines (CCLs) exist for many drugs, it is unclear whether preclinical samples can be used to predict CDR of real patients. We designed a systematic approach to evaluate how well different algorithms, trained on gene expression and drug response of CCLs, can predict CDR of patients. Using data from two large databases, we evaluated various linear and non-linear algorithms, some of which utilized information on gene interactions. Then, we developed a new algorithm called TG-LASSO that explicitly integrates information on samples' tissue of origin with gene expression profiles to improve prediction performance. Our results showed that regularized regression methods provide better prediction performance. However, including the network information or common methods of including information on the tissue of origin did not improve the results. On the other hand, TG-LASSO improved the predictions and distinguished resistant and sensitive patients for 7 out of 13 drugs. Additionally, TG-LASSO identified genes associated with the drug response, including known targets and pathways involved in the drugs' mechanism of action. Moreover, genes identified by TG-LASSO for multiple drugs in a tissue were associated with patient survival. In summary, our analysis suggests that preclinical samples can be used to predict CDR of patients and identify biomarkers of drug sensitivity and survival.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsModels, StatisticalNeoplasmsAlgorithmsComputational BiologyDatabases, GeneticGene Expression ProfilingHumansMachine LearningPrecision MedicineTranscriptomeAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID31967990
PMCPMC6975549
OpenAlexW3001022866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.