Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31967966›Full record

ArticleRadiology and oncology2020

Sequential intra-arterial infusion of 90Y-resin microspheres and mitomycin C in chemo refractory liver metastatic breast cancer patients: a single centre pilot study.

Brigitte Maximiliana Aarts, Elisabeth Geneviève Klompenhouwer, Raphaëla Carmen Dresen, Christophe Michel Albert Louis Omer Deroose, Regina Gien Hoa Beets-Tan, Kevin Punie, Patrick Neven, Hans Wildiers, Geert Maleux

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiology and oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Advanced healthcare materials · 2026
    Article
  5. Engineering microspheres for breast cancer: integrating tumor modeling, diagnostics, and targeted treatment.Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences · 2026
    Review
  6. Engineering microspheres for breast cancer: integrating tumor modeling, diagnostics, and targeted treatment.Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences · 2026
    Review
  7. Bioinformatics screened of biomarkers for the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma.Cancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Brigitte Maximiliana AartsRadiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Elisabeth Geneviève KlompenhouwerRadiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Raphaëla Carmen DresenRadiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Christophe Michel Albert Louis Omer DerooseNuclear Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Regina Gien Hoa Beets-TanRadiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Kevin PunieGeneral Medical Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Patrick NevenGeneral Medical Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Hans WildiersGeneral Medical Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Geert MaleuxRadiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
KU Leuven · BEOncode Institute · NLThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background The aim of the study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of intra-arterial mitomycin C (MMC) infusion after selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) using Yttrium-90 (90Y) resin microspheres in liver metastatic breast cancer (LMBC) patients. Patients and methods The prospective pilot study included LMBC patients from 2012-2018. Patients first received infusion of 90Y resin microspheres, after 6-8 weeks response to treatment was assessed by MRI, 18F-FDG PET/CT and laboratory tests. After exclusion of progressive disease, MMC infusion was administrated 8 weeks later in different dose cohorts; A: 6 mg in 1 cycle, B: 12 mg in 2 cycles, C: 24 mg in 2 cycles and D: maximum of 72 mg in 6 cycles. In cohort D the response was evaluated after every 2 cycles and continued after exclusion of progressive disease. Adverse events (AE) were reported according to CTCAE version 5.0. Results Sixteen patients received 90Y treatment. Four patients were excluded for MMC infusion, because of extra hepatic disease progression (n = 3) and clinical and biochemical instability (n = 1). That resulted in the following number of patient per cohort; A: 2, B: 1, C: 3 and D: 6. In 4 of the 12 patients (all cohort D) the maximum dose of MMC was adjusted due biochemical toxicities (n = 2) and progressive disease (n = 2). One grade 3 AE occurred after 90Y treatment consisting of a gastrointestinal ulcer whereby prolonged hospitalization was needed. Conclusions Sequential treatment of intra-arterial infusion of MMC after 90Y SIRT was feasible in 75% of the patients when MMC was administrated in different escalating dose cohorts. However, caution is needed to prevent reflux after 90Y SIRT in LMBC patients.

Indexed as

MicrospheresAdultAgedAntibiotics, AntineoplasticBody Surface AreaBreast NeoplasmsCombined Modality TherapyDisease ProgressionDrug Resistance, NeoplasmEmbolization, TherapeuticFeasibility StudiesFemaleHepatic ArteryHumansInfusions, Intra-ArterialLiver NeoplasmsAntibiotics, AntineoplasticMitomycinYttrium-90Yttrium Radioisotopeschemo resistantintra-arterial therapyliver metastatic breast cancermitomycin C infusionradioembolizationselective internal radiation therapy

Identifiers

PMID31967966
PMCPMC7087424
OpenAlexW3001999927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.