Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31967941›Full record

ArticleJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2020

Remote Microphone System Use in the Homes of Children With Hearing Loss: Impact on Caregiver Communication and Child Vocalizations.

Emily C Thompson, Carlos R Benítez-Barrera, Gina P Angley, Tiffany Woynaroski, Anne Marie Tharpe

Open access · greenAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Emily C ThompsonVanderbilt University Medical Center, Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Nashville, TN.
Carlos R Benítez-BarreraVanderbilt University Medical Center, Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Nashville, TN.
Gina P AngleyVanderbilt University Medical Center, Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Nashville, TN.
Tiffany WoynaroskiVanderbilt University Medical Center, Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Nashville, TN.
Anne Marie TharpeVanderbilt University Medical Center, Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Nashville, TN.
Google (United States) · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (VICTR) -Identifying correlates of functional immunity in SARS-CoV-2 convalescent plasmaUL1TR002243 · NCATS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Paul A. Harris, Wesley H Self · 2017 to 2026
$130.7M
Research Project: Sensory and Multisensory Contributions to AutismU54HD083211 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI DYKENS, ELISABETH MAY · 2015 to 2019
$7.1M
Developing Research Careers in the Hearing Sciences IIT35DC008763 · NIDCD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI LINDA J. HOOD · 2007 to 2026
$533k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002243NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD083211NIDCD NIH HHS T35 DC008763
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose This study examined the impact of home use of remote microphone systems (RMSs) on caregiver communication and child vocalizations in families of children with hearing loss. Method We drew on data from a prior study in which Language ENvironmental Analysis recorders were used with 9 families during 2 consecutive weekends-1 that involved using an RMS and 1 that did not. Audio samples from Language ENvironmental Analysis recorders were (a) manually coded to quantify the frequency of verbal repetitions and alert phrases caregivers utilized in communicating to children with hearing loss and (b) automatically analyzed to quantify children's vocalization rate, duration, complexity, and reciprocity when using and not using an RMS. Results When using an RMS at home, caregivers did not repeat or clarify their statements as often as when not using an RMS while communicating with their children with hearing loss. However, no between-condition differences were observed in children's vocal characteristics. Conclusions Results provide further support for home RMS use for children with hearing loss. Specifically, findings lend empirical support to prior parental reports suggesting that RMS use eases caregiver communication in the home setting. Studies exploring RMS use over a longer duration of time might provide further insight into potential long-term effects on children's vocal production.

Indexed as

Communication Devices for People with DisabilitiesVerbal BehaviorCaregiversChildChild LanguageChild, PreschoolCommunicationFemaleHearing Loss, SensorineuralHumansMaleTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID31967941
PMCPMC7210447
OpenAlexW3003002854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.