ArticleCancer medicine2020
Significance of bulky mass and residual tumor-Treated with or without consolidative radiotherapy-To the risk of relapse in DLBCL patients.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy and Safety Exposure-Response Analysis of Loncastuximab Tesirine in Patients with B cell non-Hodgkin Lymphoma.The AAPS journal · 2021Trial
- Post-treatment residual masses in orbital lymphoma: incidence, risk factors, and prognostic impact.Eye (London, England) · 2026Article
- First-line treatment with polatuzumab vedotin improves efficacy and survival in newly diagnosed patients with advanced diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a multicentre retrospective analysis.Annals of medicine · 2025Article
- Population based registry study on large B-cell lymphoma mortality and morbidity in Finland.Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a novel prognostic nomogram for advanced diffuse large B cell lymphoma.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2024Article
- Development and validation of a novel risk stratification model and a survival rate calculator for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in the rituximab era: a multi-institutional cohort study.Annals of hematology · 2024Article
- The expression of hypoxia inducible factor-1 alpha in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients: a cross-sectional study in Indonesia.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2023Article
- Definition of bulky disease in early stage diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in computed tomography on coronal and transverse planes.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Article
- Evolution of therapy for limited stage diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.Blood cancer journal · 2022Review
- The Effect of the Tumor Microenvironment on Lymphoid Neoplasms Derived from B Cells.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Serine Protease 3 Promotes Progression of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma and Serves as a Novel Prognostic Predictor.Disease markers · 2022Article
- PET-guided treatment for personalised therapy of Hodgkin lymphoma and aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma.The British journal of radiology · 2021Review
- Article
- Significance of bulky mass and residual tumor-Treated with or without consolidative radiotherapy-To the risk of relapse in DLBCL patients.Cancer medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bulky and residual tumor are considered to increase the risk of relapse in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients. Radiotherapy is conventionally used to reduce the risk, but the evidence is controversial. We performed a retrospective analysis to evaluate the significance of bulky and residual tumor treated with or without radiotherapy in DLBCL patients. We analyzed 312 DLBCL patients treated from 2010-2017 in Oulu University Hospital. A bulky tumor was detected in 123 patients and 55 of these patients (44.3%) received consolidative radiation therapy (RT) to the bulky tumor. Residual tumor meeting the required criteria was found in 138 (39.3%) patients, and 65 (45.5%) of these patients received consolidative RT to the site of residual tumor. iPET-CT scans were performed in 102 patients. In multivariate analyses, bulky was an independent risk factor in limited stage patients in progression free survival (HR 6.43 [95%CI 1.609-25.710]; P = .008) not related to International prognostic index (HR 1.35 [95% CI 0.256-7.124]; P = .724) or age (HR 1.62 [95% CI 0.468-5.638]; P = .445). This was not seen in advanced stage patients or in patients with residual tumor. Radiotherapy to the bulky or residual tumor was not able to improve the long-term PFS of patients. In this study, it appears that performing iPET is the most convincing method in improving evaluation and in finding patients with increased risk of relapse. Evidently, patients with negative iPET will not benefit from including RT in the treatment after metabolic complete response (CR), and patients with primary refractory disease are most likely in the group of positive iPET.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.