Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31967737›Full record

ArticleImmunity, inflammation and disease2020

Identification and characterization of protective CD8

Afshana Quadiri, Inderjeet Kalia, Mohammad Kashif, Agam P Singh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Immunity, inflammation and disease, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Role of inflammasomes in cancer immunity: mechanisms and therapeutic potential.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Host-parasite interactions duringFrontiers in immunology · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Identification and characterization of protective CD8Immunity, inflammation and disease · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Afshana QuadiriInfectious Diseases Laboratory, National Institute of Immunology, New Delhi, India.
Inderjeet KaliaInfectious Diseases Laboratory, National Institute of Immunology, New Delhi, India.
Mohammad KashifInfectious Diseases Laboratory, National Institute of Immunology, New Delhi, India.
Agam P SinghInfectious Diseases Laboratory, National Institute of Immunology, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0003-4262-2556
National Institute of Immunology · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEfforts are required at developing an effective vaccine that can inhibit malaria prevalence and transmission. Identifying the critical immunogenic antigens and understanding their interactions with host proteins forms a major focus of subunit vaccine development. Previously, our laboratory showed that SLTRiP conferred protection to the liver stage of Plasmodium growth in rodents. In the follow-up of earlier research, we demonstrate that SLTRiP-mediated protection is majorly concentrated in specific regions of protein.

methodTo identify particular protective regions of protein, we synthesized multiple nonoverlapping fragments from SLTRiP protein. From this, we designed a panel of 8-20mer synthetic peptides, which were predicted using T-epitope-based prediction algorithm. We utilized the IFN-γ enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot assay to identify immunodominant peptides. The latter were used to immunize mice, and these mice were challenged to assess protection.

resultsThe protective polypeptide fragment SLTRiP C3 and SLTRiP C4 were identified, by expressing and testing multiple fragments of PbSLTRiP protein. The immune responses generated by these fragments were compared to identify the immunodominant fragment. The T-epitopes were predicted from SLTRiP protein using computer-based algorithms. The in vitro immune responses generated by these peptides were compared with each other to identify the immunodominant T-epitope. Immunization using these peptides showed significant reduction in parasite numbers during liver stage.

conclusionOur findings show that the protective efficacy shown by SLTRiP is localized in particular protein fragments. The peptides designed from such regions showed protective efficacy equivalent to whole protein. The sequence conservation analysis with human Plasmodium species also showed that these peptides were conserved. In conclusion, these peptides or their equivalent from other Plasmodium species could impart protection against malaria in their respective hosts too. Our studies provide a basis for the inclusion of these peptides in clinical vaccine constructs against malaria.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAnimalsAntigens, ProtozoanCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesEpitope MappingEpitopes, T-LymphocyteFemaleMalariaMalaria VaccinesMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLPeptide FragmentsPlasmodium falciparumAntigens, ProtozoanEpitopes, T-LymphocyteMalaria VaccinesPeptide Fragmentsliver-stage malariaT-cell epitopesvaccine

Identifiers

PMID31967737
PMCPMC7016849
OpenAlexW3002245378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.