Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31967672›Full record

ArticleCancer2020

Breast cancer screening implications of risk modeling among female relatives of ATM and CHEK2 carriers.

Anne E Weidner, Mariel E Liggin, Brenda I Zuniga, Ann L Tezak, Georgia L Wiesner, Tuya Pal

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Clinical utility of testing for PALB2 and CHEK2 c.1100delC in breast and ovarian cancer.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Anne E WeidnerDivision of Genetic Medicine, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.ORCID 0000-0002-8007-8734
Mariel E LigginDivision of Genetic Medicine, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Brenda I ZunigaDivision of Genetic Medicine, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Ann L TezakDivision of Genetic Medicine, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Georgia L WiesnerDivision of Genetic Medicine, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Tuya PalDivision of Genetic Medicine, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Vanderbilt University Medical Center · USVanderbilt University · USTennessee State University · US

Funding

TrainingU54CA163072 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Karen Marie Winkfield · 2011 to 2026
$20.1M
TRAININGU54CA163066 · NCI · TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MARGARET M WHALEN · 2011 to 2026
$12.8M
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA163066NCI NIH HHS U54 CA163072
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith the increasing use of multigene panel tests, pathogenic and likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants are identified more frequently in the moderate-penetrance breast cancer genes ATM and CHEK2. Lifetime breast cancer risk among women with P/LP variants in these genes generally exceeds 20%, meeting the threshold at which high-risk breast cancer screening through breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is recommended.

methodsAmong a registry-based sample of 56 ATM and 69 CHEK2 carriers, the authors sought to determine the percentage of relatives in whom a P/LP variant would impact breast cancer surveillance. Lifetime breast cancer risks for unaffected, female first-degree and second-degree relatives were estimated using the Breast and Ovarian Analysis of Disease Incidence and Carrier Estimation Algorithm (BOADICEA).

resultsAmong first-degree relatives of ATM and CHEK2 carriers, only 22.6% and 14.9%, respectively, were found to have lifetime breast cancer risks of ≥20% based on family cancer history alone; however, when including the proband's P/LP variant in the model, these percentages increased significantly to 56.6% and 55.3%, respectively (P < .0001 and P < .0001, respectively). Similar increases in lifetime breast cancer risks were found among second-degree relatives.

conclusionsThe results of the current study suggest that the majority of female first-degree and second-degree relatives of ATM and CHEK2 carriers do not qualify for breast MRI based on family cancer history alone. Therefore, testing for these genes, as well as awareness of positive moderate-penetrance breast cancer gene results in the family, may impact MRI eligibility. These findings highlight the potential usefulness of and need for breast cancer risk models that incorporate moderate-penetrance gene positivity to inform screening recommendations among at-risk family members.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsBreast NeoplasmsCheckpoint Kinase 2Early Detection of CancerFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic TestingHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMiddle AgedRiskYoung AdultAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsATM protein, humanCheckpoint Kinase 2CHEK2 protein, humanATMbreast cancercancer screeningCHEK2risk assessment

Identifiers

PMID31967672
PMCPMC7103510
OpenAlexW3002796172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.