Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31967359›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2020

Deceased vs living donor grafts for pediatric simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation: A single-center experience.

Sergey Gautier, Artem Monakhov, Olga Tsiroulnikova, Mikhail Voskanov, Igor Miloserdov, Timur Dzhanbekov, Sergey Meshcheryakov, Robert Latypov, Elena Chekletsova, Olga Malomuzh and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Sergey GautierSurgical Department #2, National Medical Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs named after V.I. Shumakov, Moscow, Russia.
Artem MonakhovSurgical Department #2, National Medical Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs named after V.I. Shumakov, Moscow, Russia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3537-6601
Olga TsiroulnikovaI.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia.
Mikhail VoskanovSurgical Department #2, National Medical Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs named after V.I. Shumakov, Moscow, Russia.
Igor MiloserdovSurgical Department #1, National Medical Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs named after V.I. Shumakov, Moscow, Russia.
Timur DzhanbekovSurgical Department #2, National Medical Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs named after V.I. Shumakov, Moscow, Russia.
Sergey MeshcheryakovSurgical Department #2, National Medical Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs named after V.I. Shumakov, Moscow, Russia.
Robert LatypovSurgical Department #2, National Medical Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs named after V.I. Shumakov, Moscow, Russia.
Elena ChekletsovaDepartment of Pediatrics, National Medical Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs named after V.I. Shumakov, Moscow, Russia.
Olga MalomuzhSurgical Department #2, National Medical Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs named after V.I. Shumakov, Moscow, Russia.
Khizri KhizroevSurgical Department #2, National Medical Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs named after V.I. Shumakov, Moscow, Russia.
Deniz DzhinerSurgical Department #2, National Medical Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs named after V.I. Shumakov, Moscow, Russia.
Irina PashkovaDepartment of Pediatrics, National Medical Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs named after V.I. Shumakov, Moscow, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn conditions of limited experience of pediatric simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation (SLKT) using grafts from living and deceased donors, there is a certain need to validate the approach. PATIENTS: The retrospective study of 18 pediatric patients who received SLKT between 2008 and 2019.

resultsGrafts were obtained from both living and deceased donors. The patients' age ranged from 2 to 16 years (9 years ±4). The body weight of the children varied from 9.5 to 39 kg (22 kg ±9). The follow-up period lasted from 1 to 109 months (median 38 months ±35). The various graft combinations were used in both groups. There was no mortality during the follow-up. There was no significant difference in baseline parameters in recipients who received grafts from living and deceased donors except age (7.5 years ±2.2 vs 11.8 years ±4.1; P = .038). Rate of complications > grade II was higher among recipients of deceased donor SLKT (7.7% vs 60%; OR, 7.8; 95% CI, 1.04-58.48; P = .044). All the patients are alive with both grafts functioning. All the living donors returned to the normal life.

conclusionSLKT is a safe and effective procedure for children with both simultaneous end-stage liver disease and end-stage renal disease. Both living donor partial liver and kidney transplantation and deceased donor liver-kidney transplantation can be considered as safe and feasible options.

Indexed as

Living DonorsAdolescentCadaverChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansKidney TransplantationLiver TransplantationMaleMorbidityPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcomeautosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease/congenital hepatic fibrosisliving donorlong-term outcomessimultaneous liver-kidney transplantationsplit-liver transplantation

Identifiers

PMID31967359
PMCPMC7307349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.