Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31967282›Full record

SynthesisClinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2020

Prior exercise training and experimental myocardial infarction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Eduardo Carvalho de Arruda Veiga, Brunno Lemes de Melo, Stella de Souza Vieira, Ricardo S Simões, Vitor E Valenti, Marcelo Ferraz Campos, Joseane Elza Tonussi Mendez Rossetti do Vale, Roberta Lukesvicius Rica, José Maria Soares-Júnior, Edmund Chada Baracat and 3 more

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Eduardo Carvalho de Arruda VeigaDisciplina de Ginecologia, Departamento de Ginecologia e Obstetricia, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, BR.ORCID 0000-0002-0167-861X
Brunno Lemes de MeloDivisao de Cardiologia, Departamento de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, BR.
Stella de Souza VieiraDivisao de Cardiologia, Departamento de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, BR.
Ricardo S SimõesDisciplina de Ginecologia, Departamento de Ginecologia e Obstetricia, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, BR.
Vitor E ValentiPrograma de Pos-Graduacao em Fisioterapia, Universidade Estadual de Sao Paulo (UNESP), Presidente Prudente, SP, BR.
Marcelo Ferraz CamposDisciplina de Delineamento de Estudos e Escrita Cientifica, Centro Universitario Saude ABC, Santo Andre, SP, BR.
Joseane Elza Tonussi Mendez Rossetti do ValeSecretaria de Estado da Saude do Acre, Acre, AC, BR.
Roberta Lukesvicius RicaDepartamento de Educacao Fisica, Universidade Estacio de Sa, Vitoria, ES, BR.
José Maria Soares-JúniorDisciplina de Ginecologia, Departamento de Ginecologia e Obstetricia, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, BR.ORCID 0000-0003-0774-9404
Edmund Chada BaracatDisciplina de Ginecologia, Departamento de Ginecologia e Obstetricia, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, BR.ORCID 0000-0003-0111-9030
Andrey Jorge SerraDivisao de Cardiologia, Departamento de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, BR.
Julien S BakerInstitute for Clinical Exercise and Health Sciences, School of Health and Life Sciences, the University of the West of Scotland, Lanarkshire, Scotland.
Danilo Sales BocaliniLaboratorio de Fisiologia e Bioquimica Experimental, Centro de Educacao Fisica e Deportos, Universidade Federal do Espirito Santo, Vitoria, ES, BR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exercising prior to experimental infarction may have beneficial effects on the heart. The objective of this study was to analyze studies on animals that had exercised prior to myocardial infarction and to examine any benefits through a systematic review and meta-analysis. The databases MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and Cochrane were consulted. We analyzed articles published between January 1978 and November 2018. From a total of 858 articles, 13 manuscripts were selected in this review. When animals exercised before experimental infarction, there was a reduction in mortality, a reduction in infarct size, improvements in cardiac function, and a better molecular balance between genes and proteins that exhibit cardiac protective effects. Analyzing heart weight/body weight, we observed the following results - Mean difference 95% CI - -0.02 [-0.61,0.57]. Meta-analysis of the infarct size (% of the left ventricle) revealed a statistically significant decrease in the size of the infarction in animals that exercised before myocardial infarction, in comparison with the sedentary animals -5.05 [-7.68, -2.40]. Analysis of the ejection fraction, measured by echo (%), revealed that animals that exercised before myocardial infarction exhibited higher and statistically significant measures, compared with sedentary animals 8.77 [3.87,13.66]. We conclude that exercise performed prior to experimental myocardial infarction confers cardiac benefits to animals.

Indexed as

Physical Conditioning, AnimalAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalFemaleHeartHeart VentriclesMaleMiceModels, CardiovascularMyocardial InfarctionRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyRats, WistarVentricular Function

Identifiers

PMID31967282
PMCPMC6963162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.