Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31967220›Full record

ArticleRevista Brasileira de terapia intensiva

Reliability of skeletal muscle ultrasound in critically ill trauma patients.

Luciana Vieira, Lara Patrícia Bastos Rocha, Sunita Mathur, Larissa Santana, Priscilla Flávia de Melo, Vinicius Zacarias Maldaner da Silva, João Luiz Quaglioti Durigan, Gerson Cipriano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista Brasileira de terapia intensiva. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Reliability of point-of-care ultrasound for measuring quadriceps femoris muscle thickness.European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Luciana VieiraPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências e Tecnologias em Saúde, Universidade de Brasília - Brasília (DF), Brasil.
Lara Patrícia Bastos RochaPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências e Tecnologias em Saúde, Universidade de Brasília - Brasília (DF), Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0461-888X
Sunita MathurDepartamento de Fisioterapia, Universidade de Toronto - Toronto, Ontario, Canadá.
Larissa SantanaDepartamento de Fisioterapia, Universidade de Toronto - Toronto, Ontario, Canadá.
Priscilla Flávia de MeloPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências e Tecnologias em Saúde, Universidade de Brasília - Brasília (DF), Brasil.
Vinicius Zacarias Maldaner da SilvaPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências e Tecnologias em Saúde, Universidade de Brasília - Brasília (DF), Brasil.
João Luiz Quaglioti DuriganPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências e Tecnologias em Saúde, Universidade de Brasília - Brasília (DF), Brasil.
Gerson CiprianoPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências e Tecnologias em Saúde, Universidade de Brasília - Brasília (DF), Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6323-7003

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the safety and feasibility of the ultrasound assessment of quadriceps in the emergency setting. To assess the intra- and interrater reliability for the acquisition and analysis of ultrasound images of muscle thickness and echogenicity in critically ill trauma patients between health professionals with different levels of expertise.

methodsDiagnostic accuracy study. Two examiners (expert and novice) acquired ultrasound images from ten patients; an experienced, blinded analyst quantified the images. In a separate group of ten patients, two analysts (expert and novice) quantified quadriceps muscle thickness and echogenicity (square or trace method) from images acquired by one examiner.

resultsExcellent reliability was found for image acquisition and analysis (intraclass correlation coefficients > 0.987; p < 0.001). The standard error of the measurement values ranged from 0.01 - 0.06cm for muscle thickness and from 0.75 - 2.04 arbitrary units for muscle echogenicity. The coefficients of variation were < 6% for thickness and echogenicity. The echogenicity values were higher when using the square technique than when using the tracing technique (p = 0.003).

conclusionUltrasound is safe, feasible, and reliable for muscle assessment in critically ill trauma patients, regardless of the assessor's level of expertise.

Indexed as

AdultCritical IllnessFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuadriceps MuscleReproducibility of ResultsUltrasonographyWounds and InjuriesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31967220
PMCPMC7008982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.