Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31967107›Full record

ArticleHawai'i journal of health & social welfare2020

Highly-Effective Contraception Use More Likely Among Native Hawaiian Women than Non-Native Hawaiian Women at Title X Clinics in Hawai'i.

Chelsea Yin, Scott Harvey, Jennifer Elia, Bliss Kaneshiro, Donald Hayes, Reni Soon

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Hawai'i journal of health & social welfare, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 98% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chelsea YinDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, & Women's Health, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawai'i, Honolulu, HI (CY, SH, JE, BK, RS).
Scott HarveyDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, & Women's Health, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawai'i, Honolulu, HI (CY, SH, JE, BK, RS).
Jennifer EliaDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, & Women's Health, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawai'i, Honolulu, HI (CY, SH, JE, BK, RS).
Bliss KaneshiroDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, & Women's Health, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawai'i, Honolulu, HI (CY, SH, JE, BK, RS).
Donald HayesHawai'i State Department of Health Family Health Services Division, Honolulu, HI (DH).
Reni SoonDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, & Women's Health, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawai'i, Honolulu, HI (CY, SH, JE, BK, RS).
University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa · USHawaii Department of Health · US

Funding

The Role of gp120 on Cardiovascular Disease in People Living with HIVU54MD007601 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT MANOA · PI Gehan Devendra · 2017 to 2026
$59.5M
NIMHD NIH HHS U54 MD007601
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Differences in contraceptive method use have been noted among women of different races, but studies describing contraceptive method use among Native Hawaiian women have not been published. To examine method choice in this group, the authors conducted a database review of the Hawai'i State Department of Health Title X program. Reviewed were client visit records (CVRs) that health care providers completed for women who were ages 15-44 years, avoiding pregnancy, not currently pregnant, and using a contraceptive method (N=54 513). Because a patient could have had several visits during the study period, the contraceptive method chosen at the last visit was selected for analysis. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, bivariate analyses, and logistic regression. The proportion of Native Hawaiian women who selected a highly-effective method of contraception (HEC), defined as an intrauterine device, implant, or permanent contraception, was higher than the proportion of non-Native Hawaiian women who selected an HEC. Overall, 15.4% of Native Hawaiian women during the study period chose HEC, compared to 8.8% of non-Native Hawaiian women. In a logistic regression analysis, Native Hawaiian women ages 15-29 were 1.46 times more likely to use HEC (95% CI: 1.35-1.58) than non-Native Hawaiian women ages 15-29, and Native Hawaiian women ages 30-44 were 1.69 times more likely to use HEC (95% CI: 1.53-1.87) than non-Native Hawaiian women in the same age group. Because Native Hawaiian women are reported to have higher rates of unintended pregnancy in the state compared to other racial groups, additional research exploring contraceptive non-use and pregnancy intention are needed.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorContraceptive EffectivenessNative Hawaiian or Pacific IslanderAdolescentAdultContraceptionContraception BehaviorContraceptive Agents, FemaleFemaleHawaiiHumansIntrauterine DevicesLogistic ModelsPatient Acceptance of Health CarePregnancyPregnancy, UnplannedContraceptive Agents, FemalecontraceptionimplantIUDNative Hawaiianpermanent contraceptionTitle Xunintended pregnancy

Identifiers

PMID31967107
PMCPMC6969390
OpenAlexW3005313847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.