ArticleCureus2020
Etiology of Pericardial Effusion and Outcomes Post Pericardiocentesis in the Western Region of Saudi Arabia: A Single-center Experience.
Article in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Etiologies, fluid characteristics, and outcomes of pericardiocentesis: a five-year retrospective study from a single center.Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology · 2025Article
- Clinico-Epidemiological Profile of Children Admitted with Pericardial Effusion in a Tertiary Care Hospital: An Observational Study.Acta Cardiologica Sinica · 2024Article
- Case series of unusual cases of hypothyroidism-induced pericardial effusion.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2024Article
- Article
- The Diagnostic Deceiver: Radiological Pictorial Review of Tuberculosis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Pericardial effusion in hypothyroidism: A case report.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2021Article
- Percutaneous pericardiocentesis for pericardial effusion: predictors of mortality and outcomes.Internal and emergency medicine · 2021Observational
- Impact of pericardial fluid glucose level and computed tomography attenuation values on diagnosis of malignancy-related pericardial effusion.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2021Observational
- Pulmonary hypertension concurrent with pericardial effusion and superior vena cava syndrome: who is the initiator?Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC · 2020Article
- Article
- Focused Cardiac Ultrasound is Applicable to Internal Medicine and Critical Care but Skill Gaps Currently Limit Use.Journal of the Saudi Heart Association · 2020Article
- Characteristics of Significant Pericardial Effusion and Outcomes of Pericardiocentesis: A 4-year Retrospective Data Review.Heart views : the official journal of the Gulf Heart AssociationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Pericardial effusion is the accumulation of blood or excess fluid in the cavity between the heart and the pericardium sac. Pericardial effusion can be caused by several etiologies, including malignant and non-malignant causes. Pericardiocentesis is the gold standard assessment method for pericardial effusion etiology. The aim of this study was to identify the long-term outcome of patients who presented with massive pericardial effusion and underwent pericardiocentesis at King Abdulaziz Medical City, Jeddah, a large tertiary hospital in the western part of Saudi Arabia. Methods This is a single-center retrospective cross-sectional study conducted at King Abdulaziz Medical City Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, between January 2013 to December 2018. Data were collected from patient's charts; the clinical and echocardiographic findings, alongside with pericardial fluid analysis, were collected. Procedure and patients outcomes were obtained and reported. Results Of the 107 patients with pericardial effusion, 39 patients had moderate to severe pericardial effusion requiring pericardiocentesis. The mean age was 52 years, and 56.4% were females. The most common chronic disease was hypertension and the presence of metastasis. The most common cause of pericardial effusion was a malignancy. A majority of patients had severe pericardial effusion. Many patients had tamponade (69.6%). Patients with malignant pericardial effusion had a median survival of 54 days. Conclusion Etiologies of pericardial effusion requiring drainage depend on the population studied. Patients with malignant effusions have worse outcomes than non-malignant effusion. Pericardiocentesis is required to ascertain the cause and risk-stratify patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.