Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31966933›Full record

ArticleIEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine2020

Analyze Informant-Based Questionnaire for The Early Diagnosis of Senile Dementia Using Deep Learning.

Fubao Zhu, Xiaonan Li, Daniel Mcgonigle, Haipeng Tang, Zhuo He, Chaoyang Zhang, Guang-Uei Hung, Pai-Yi Chiu, Weihua Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Confidence interval for micro-averagedApplied intelligence (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Fubao Zhu1School of Computer and Communication EngineeringZhengzhou University of Light IndustryZhengzhou450002China.
Xiaonan Li1School of Computer and Communication EngineeringZhengzhou University of Light IndustryZhengzhou450002China.
Daniel Mcgonigle2School of Computing Sciences and Computer EngineeringUniversity of Southern MississippiLong BeachMS39560USA.
Haipeng Tang2School of Computing Sciences and Computer EngineeringUniversity of Southern MississippiLong BeachMS39560USA.
Zhuo He3College of ComputingMichigan Technological UniversityHoughtonMI49931USA.
Chaoyang Zhang2School of Computing Sciences and Computer EngineeringUniversity of Southern MississippiLong BeachMS39560USA.
Guang-Uei Hung4Department of Nuclear MedicineChang Bing Show Chwan Memorial HospitalChanghua505Taiwan.
Pai-Yi Chiu5Department of NeurologyShow Chwan Memorial HospitalChanghua500Taiwan.
Weihua Zhou3College of ComputingMichigan Technological UniversityHoughtonMI49931USA.

Funding

American Heart Association-American Stroke Association 17AIREA33700016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis paper proposes a multiclass deep learning method for the classification of dementia using an informant-based questionnaire.

methodsA deep neural network classification model based on Keras framework is proposed in this paper. To evaluate the advantages of our proposed method, we compared the performance of our model with industry-standard machine learning approaches. We enrolled 6,701 individuals, which were randomly divided into training data sets (6030 participants) and test data sets (671 participants). We evaluated each diagnostic model in the test set using accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-Score.

resultsCompared with the seven conventional machine learning algorithms, the DNN showed higher stability and achieved the best accuracy with 0.88, which also showed good results for identifying normal (F1-score = 0.88), mild cognitive impairment (MCI) (F1-score = 0.87), very mild dementia (VMD) (F1-score = 0.77) and Severe dementia (F1-score = 0.94).

conclusionThe deep neural network (DNN) classification model can effectively help doctors accurately screen patients who have normal cognitive function, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), very mild dementia (VMD), mild dementia (Mild), moderate dementia (Moderate), and severe dementia (Severe).

Indexed as

deep neural networkDementiainformation gainmachine learning

Identifiers

PMID31966933
PMCPMC6964964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.