ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental pathology2017
Prognostic values of EphB1/B2 and p-EphB1/B2 expression in non-small cell lung cancer.
Article in International journal of clinical and experimental pathology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Functions and clinical significance of KCNB1 in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Journal of gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Ephs in cancer progression: complexity and context-dependent nature in signaling, angiogenesis and immunity.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2024Review
- miR-31 Displays Subtype Specificity in Lung Cancer.Cancer research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Erythropoietin-producing hepatocellular carcinoma (Eph) Receptor, as a family member of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTK), plays a critical role in modulating different cell behaviors. It is also closely related to tumorigenesis. However, little has been known about its prognostic values in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Thus, we studied the expression levels of EphB1/2 and p-EphB1/2 in both NSCLC tissue and normal lung tissue, and analyzed their correlations with clinicopathological characteristics as well as NSCLC patients' survival. In the present study, 156 NSCLC tissue samples and 28 distal normal lung tissue samples were collected from 156 NSCLC patients. Afterwards, the protein levels of EphB1/2 and p-EphB1/2 were detected by immunohistochemistry. Their prognostic values were also evaluated using both univariate and multivariate survival analysis. According to the results, 44.87% (70/156) NSCLC samples were detected with positive EphB1/2 expression, significantly higher than that in distal normal lung tissue (16%, 4/25); but no difference was found regarding to p-EphB1/2 expression. With respect to the clinicopathological characteristics, there was no significant correlation between protein levels and age, gender, histological type, differentiation status as well as TNM stage. Intriguingly, it showed a clear trend of increased EphB1/2-positive rate when tumor differentiation grade developed. In the survival analysis, a positive correlation was found between positive p-EphB1/2 expression and poor survival in female (P=0.001). Then N stage (P=0.001) and TNM stage (P<0.001) were found significantly related to patients' survival in multivariate analysis. Therefore, p-EphB1/2 may serve as a prognostic predictor in female NSCLC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31966900PMC6965981W3027345856What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.