ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental pathology2017
Isolation and identification of cancer stem cells from PC3 human prostate carcinoma cell line.
Article in International journal of clinical and experimental pathology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Application of an Integrated Single-Cell and Three-Dimensional Spheroid Culture Platform for Investigating Drug Resistance Heterogeneity and Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition (EMT) in Lung Cancer Subclones.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Article
- Prostate cancer-derived holoclones: a novel and effective model for evaluating cancer stemness.Scientific reports · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveMorphological differences of PC3 clones were dynamically observed, and the expression of CD44 in different clones was detected to compare the tumorigenic ability of different clone cells in nude mice and identify the clones containing prostate cancer stem cells. MATERIALS AND
methodsClone formation assay was used for observing and classifying PC3 clones and calculating the cloning efficiency and the proportion of each clone. CD44 expression in different clones was detected by immunofluorescence technique. In addition, different morphologies of clones were isolated to measure the ability of self-renewing, and inoculated into nude mice to observe the tumorigenic ability.
resultsPC3 cells could form three morphologies of clones, namely holoclone, meroclone, and paraclone. The cloning efficiency was 10.23%±0.91%, and the proportion of the three clones was 11.7%, 50.0% and 38.3%, respectively. Immunofluorescence showed that the expression of CD44 in holoclone was significantly stronger than meroclone and paraclone. Holoclone had self-renewing ability and strong tumorigenic ability in nude mice.
conclusionThere are differences in morphologies and differentiation of PC3 clones. Moreover, prostate cancer stem cells are abundant in holoclone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31966689PMC6965485W3027718561What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.