Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31966681›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental pathology2017

Urinary microRNAs as potential biomarkers for differentiating the "atypical urothelial cells" category of the Paris system for reporting urine cytology.

Sung Sun Kim, Chan Choi, Dong Deuk Kwon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical and experimental pathology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sung Sun KimDepartment of Pathology, Chonnam National University Medical School Gwangju, Republic of Korea.
Chan ChoiDepartment of Pathology, Chonnam National University Medical School Gwangju, Republic of Korea.
Dong Deuk KwonDepartment of Urology, Chonnam National University Medical School Gwangju, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MicroRNA is known to be an important regulator of gene expression. The microRNAs that were found to be differentially expressed in normal urothelium and urothelial carcinomas in the literature were selected and meaningful microRNAs were validated using urothelial tumor cells lines; formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues; and urine samples for both the definitely benign and malignant categories. Diagnostic utility was also assessed by applying validated microRNAs to urine specimens in the "atypical urothelial cells" category of the Paris System for Reporting Urine Cytology. Among the 25 consistently directed microRNAs in 2 or more studies, 14 microRNAs were upregulated and 11 downregulated. In urothelial tumor cell lines, 3 microRNAs were upregulated and 8 microRNAs were downregulated. In the step using FFPE tissues, four microRNAs (miR-145, miR-133a, miR-125b, and miR-99a) levels were downregulated and four microRNAs (miR-96, miR-141, miR-200c, and miR-205) were upregulated in the entire spectrum of urothelial neoplasms. Similar expression profiles were observed in urine specimens of "negative for high-grade urothelial carcinoma" and "urothelial carcinoma". The expression of miR-99a revealed different trends among the atypical urothelial categories. The findings from this study show that consistently upregulated or downregulated microRNAs might be involved in tumorigenesis or progression of urothelial carcinoma and that they could be used as potential diagnostic or prognostic markers.

Indexed as

diagnosisMicroRNAstransitional cell carcinomaurinary bladderurine

Identifiers

PMID31966681
PMCPMC6965417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.