ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental pathology2017
Urinary microRNAs as potential biomarkers for differentiating the "atypical urothelial cells" category of the Paris system for reporting urine cytology.
Article in International journal of clinical and experimental pathology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Urinary MicroRNAs as Potential Markers for Non-Invasive Diagnosis of Bladder Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
MicroRNA is known to be an important regulator of gene expression. The microRNAs that were found to be differentially expressed in normal urothelium and urothelial carcinomas in the literature were selected and meaningful microRNAs were validated using urothelial tumor cells lines; formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues; and urine samples for both the definitely benign and malignant categories. Diagnostic utility was also assessed by applying validated microRNAs to urine specimens in the "atypical urothelial cells" category of the Paris System for Reporting Urine Cytology. Among the 25 consistently directed microRNAs in 2 or more studies, 14 microRNAs were upregulated and 11 downregulated. In urothelial tumor cell lines, 3 microRNAs were upregulated and 8 microRNAs were downregulated. In the step using FFPE tissues, four microRNAs (miR-145, miR-133a, miR-125b, and miR-99a) levels were downregulated and four microRNAs (miR-96, miR-141, miR-200c, and miR-205) were upregulated in the entire spectrum of urothelial neoplasms. Similar expression profiles were observed in urine specimens of "negative for high-grade urothelial carcinoma" and "urothelial carcinoma". The expression of miR-99a revealed different trends among the atypical urothelial categories. The findings from this study show that consistently upregulated or downregulated microRNAs might be involved in tumorigenesis or progression of urothelial carcinoma and that they could be used as potential diagnostic or prognostic markers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31966681PMC6965417What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.