ArticleCancer medicine2020
Race, tumor location, and disease progression among low-risk prostate cancer patients.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Progression on active surveillance for prostate cancer in Black men: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2022Pooled it
- Immunologic Assessment of Tumors from a Race-matched Military Cohort Identifies Mast Cell Depletion as a Marker of Prostate Cancer Progression.Cancer research communications · 2023Article
- Tumor Location and a Tumor Volume over 2.8 cc Predict the Prognosis for Japanese Localized Prostate Cancer.Cancers · 2022Article
- Substantial Gleason reclassification in Black men with national comprehensive cancer network low-risk prostate cancer - A propensity score analysis.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2022Article
- Female Colon Cancer Metastasis Pattern and Prognosis: A SEER-Based Study.BioMed research international · 2022Article
- Race, tumor location, and disease progression among low-risk prostate cancer patients.Cancer medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe relationship between race, prostate tumor location, and BCR-free survival is inconclusive. This study examined the independent and joint roles of patient race and tumor location on biochemical recurrence-free (BCR) survival.
methodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted among men with newly diagnosed, biopsy-confirmed, NCCN-defined low risk CaP who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) at the Walter Reed National Military Medical Center from 1996 to 2008. BCR-free survival was modeled using Kaplan-Meier estimation curves and multivariable Cox proportional hazards (PH) analyses.
resultsThere were 539 eligible patients with low-risk CaP (25% African American, AA; 75% Caucasian American, CA). Median age at CaP diagnosis and post-RP follow-up time was 59.2 and 8.1 years, respectively. Kaplan-Meier analyses showed no significant association between race (P = .52) or predominant tumor location (P = .98) on BCR-free survival. In Cox PH multivariable analysis, neither race (HR = 1.18; 95% CI = 0.68-2.02; P = .56) nor predominant tumor location (HR = 1.13; 95% CI = 0.59-2.15; P = .71) was an independent predictor of BCR-free survival.
conclusionsNeither race nor predominant tumor location was associated with adverse oncologic outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.